Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31368906›Full record

ReviewAdvances in anatomic pathology2019

A Comprehensive Review of Ovarian Serous Carcinoma.

Yuichiro Hatano, Kayoko Hatano, Maho Tamada, Ken-Ichirou Morishige, Hiroyuki Tomita, Hiroyuki Yanai, Akira Hara

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Advances in anatomic pathology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
8.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. [Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2025
    Article
  4. Review
  5. The Pathology according to p53 Pathway.Pathobiology : journal of immunopathology, molecular and cellular biology · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Targeting ovarian cancer stem cells: a new way out.Stem cell research & therapy · 2023
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yuichiro HatanoDepartments of Tumor Pathology.
Kayoko HatanoObstetrics and Gynecology, Gifu University Graduate School of Medicine, Yanagido, Gifu.
Maho TamadaDepartments of Tumor Pathology.
Ken-Ichirou MorishigeObstetrics and Gynecology, Gifu University Graduate School of Medicine, Yanagido, Gifu.
Hiroyuki TomitaDepartments of Tumor Pathology.
Hiroyuki YanaiDepartment of Pathology, Okayama University Hospital, Kita-Ku, Okayama, Japan.
Akira HaraDepartments of Tumor Pathology.
Gifu University · JPOkayama University Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although ovarian serous carcinoma is a well-studied human gynecologic malignancy, this high-grade tumor remains fatal. The main purpose of this review is to summarize the accumulated evidence on serous malignant tumors and to clarify the unresolved issues. We discuss the 8 dichotomies of serous carcinoma: high grade versus low grade, ovarian versus extraovarian primary, extrauterine versus uterine primary, sporadic versus hereditary, orthodox versus alternative histology, p53 overexpression versus complete absence of immunophenotype, TP53-mutated versus intact precursor, and therapy responsive versus refractory. In addition, we summarize the molecular classification of high-grade serous carcinoma. This review would lead readers to rapid and parallel developments in understanding high-grade serous carcinoma.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Ovarian EpithelialCystadenocarcinoma, SerousFemaleHumansNeoplasm GradingNeoplasms, Glandular and EpithelialOvarian NeoplasmsTumor Suppressor Protein p53Tumor Suppressor Protein p53

Identifiers

PMID31368906
PMCPMC7043727
OpenAlexW2965796263

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.