ReviewCurrent cardiology reviews2020
Combined Brain/Heart Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus.
Review in Current cardiology reviews, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Association between systemic lupus erythematosus and cardiovascular health based on genetic data.Clinical rheumatology · 2025Article
- Cardiac MRI in Rheumatic Disease.Rheumatic diseases clinics of North America · 2024Review
- Organ Manifestation and Systematic Organ Screening at the Onset of Inflammatory Rheumatic Diseases.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Cardiac MRI in Autoimmune Diseases: Where Are We Now?Current cardiology reviews · 2021Review
- The heart-brain team: neurocardiologyArchivos de cardiologia de Mexico · 2020Article
- Current understanding and future perspectives of brain-heart-kidney axis in psoriatic arthritis.Rheumatology international · 2020Review
- Is There a Brain/Heart Interaction in Rheumatoid Arthritis and Seronegative Spondyloartropathies? A Combined Brain/Heart Magnetic Resonance Imaging Reveals the Answer.Current rheumatology reports · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 7 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cardiovascular Disease (CVD) in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) and Neuropsychiatric SLE (NPSLE) has an estimated prevalence of 50% and 40%, respectively and both constitute major causes of death among SLE patients. In this review, a combined brain/heart Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) for SLE risk stratification has been proposed. The pathophysiologic background of NPSLE includes microangiopathy, macroscopic infarcts and accelerated atherosclerosis. Classic brain MRI findings demonstrate lesions suggestive of NPSLE in 50% of the NPSLE cases, while advanced MRI indices can detect pre-clinical lesions in the majority of them, but their clinical impact still remains unknown. Cardiac involvement in SLE includes myo-pericarditis, valvular disease/endocarditis, Heart Failure (HF), coronary macro-microvascular disease, vasculitis and pulmonary hypertension. Classic and advanced Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (CMR) indices allow function and tissue characterization for early diagnosis and treatment follow-up of CVD in SLE. Although currently, there are no clinical data supporting the combined use of brain/heart MRI in asymptomatic SLE, it may have a place in cases with clinical suspicion of brain/heart involvement, especially in patients at high risk for CVD/stroke such as SLE with antiphospholipid syndrome (SLE/APS), in whom concurrent cardiac and brain lesions have been identified. Furthermore, it may be of value in SLE with multi-organ involvement, NPSLE with concurrent cardiac involvement, and recent onset of arrhythmia and/or heart failure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.