Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31368779›Full record

ArticleClinical trials (London, England)2019

Objective monitoring of mosquito bednet usage and the ethical challenge of respecting study bystanders' privacy.

Paul Krezanoski, Jessica Haberer

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical trials (London, England), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Paul KrezanoskiUniversity of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5376-5336
Jessica HabererMassachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.

Funding

HIV cure studies: risk, risk perception, and ethicsR01AI114617 · NIAID · RUTGERS BIOMEDICAL/HEALTH SCIENCES-RBHS · PI EYAL, NIR · 2015 to 2018
$3.2M
The ethics of electronic adherence monitoring for HIV research and care in UgandaR21AI108329 · NIAID · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI EYAL, NIR, HABERER, JESSICA ELIZABETH · 2013 to 2014
$411k
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI114617NIAID NIH HHS R21 AI108329
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Insecticide-treated bednets are among the most prevalent and cost-effective tools for preventing malaria throughout the world. Consistent bednet use is crucial for effectiveness, but assessing adherence is challenging due to limitations in current measurement tools. Recent technologies have introduced methods for remote electronic bednet use monitoring. While valuable for researchers, these monitoring tools create potential ethical concerns for study bystanders because the monitors are typically unable to discriminate between individuals who are or are not study participants. Considerations related to study bystanders, including privacy, ancillary care obligations, and community perceptions, are discussed.

Indexed as

Insecticide-Treated BednetsSexual PartnersAnimalsClinical Trials as TopicCulicidaeHumansInformed ConsentMalariaPrivacyResearch Subjectsadherence monitoringancillary care obligationsbednetsBystander privacycommunity perceptionsmalaria prevention

Identifiers

PMID31368779
PMCPMC10561128

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.