Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31368776›Full record

ReviewThe British journal of radiology2019

The quantitative neuroradiology initiative framework: application to dementia.

Olivia Goodkin, Hugh Pemberton, Sjoerd B Vos, Ferran Prados, Carole H Sudre, James Moggridge, M Jorge Cardoso, Sebastien Ourselin, Sotirios Bisdas, Mark White and 3 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The British journal of radiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Personalizing progressive changes to brain structure in Alzheimer's disease using normative modeling.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2024
    Article
  11. Artificial Intelligence and Multiple Sclerosis.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2024
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Personalising Alzheimer's Disease progression using brain atrophy markers.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Olivia Goodkin1Centre for Medical Image Computing (CMIC), Department of Medical Physics and Bioengineering, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Hugh Pemberton1Centre for Medical Image Computing (CMIC), Department of Medical Physics and Bioengineering, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Sjoerd B Vos1Centre for Medical Image Computing (CMIC), Department of Medical Physics and Bioengineering, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Ferran Prados1Centre for Medical Image Computing (CMIC), Department of Medical Physics and Bioengineering, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Carole H Sudre8School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London.
James Moggridge2Neuroradiological Academic Unit, Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
M Jorge Cardoso8School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London.
Sebastien Ourselin8School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London.
Sotirios Bisdas2Neuroradiological Academic Unit, Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Mark White10Digital Services, University College London Hospital, London United Kingdom.
Tarek Yousry2Neuroradiological Academic Unit, Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
John Thornton2Neuroradiological Academic Unit, Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Frederik Barkhof1Centre for Medical Image Computing (CMIC), Department of Medical Physics and Bioengineering, University College London, London, United Kingdom.

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/M009106/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There are numerous challenges to identifying, developing and implementing quantitative techniques for use in clinical radiology, suggesting the need for a common translational pathway. We developed the quantitative neuroradiology initiative (QNI), as a model framework for the technical and clinical validation necessary to embed automated segmentation and other image quantification software into the clinical neuroradiology workflow. We hypothesize that quantification will support reporters with clinically relevant measures contextualized with normative data, increase the precision of longitudinal comparisons, and generate more consistent reporting across levels of radiologists' experience. The QNI framework comprises the following steps: (1) establishing an area of clinical need and identifying the appropriate proven imaging biomarker(s) for the disease in question; (2) developing a method for automated analysis of these biomarkers, by designing an algorithm and compiling reference data; (3) communicating the results via an intuitive and accessible quantitative report; (4) technically and clinically validating the proposed tool pre-use; (5) integrating the developed analysis pipeline into the clinical reporting workflow; and (6) performing in-use evaluation. We will use current radiology practice in dementia as an example, where radiologists have established visual rating scales to describe the degree and pattern of atrophy they detect. These can be helpful, but are somewhat subjective and coarse classifiers, suffering from floor and ceiling limitations. Meanwhile, several imaging biomarkers relevant to dementia diagnosis and management have been proposed in the literature; some clinically approved radiology software tools exist but in general, these have not undergone rigorous clinical validation in high volume or in tertiary dementia centres. The QNI framework aims to address this need. Quantitative image analysis is developing apace within the research domain. Translating quantitative techniques into the clinical setting presents significant challenges, which must be addressed to meet the increasing demand for accurate, timely and impactful clinical imaging services.

Indexed as

BrainDementiaEvaluation Studies as TopicHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingNeuroimaging

Identifiers

PMID31368776
PMCPMC6732931

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.