ReviewThe British journal of radiology2019
The quantitative neuroradiology initiative framework: application to dementia.
Review in The British journal of radiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
26 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Commercial volumetric MRI reporting tools in multiple sclerosis: a systematic review of the evidence.Neuroradiology · 2023Pooled it
- Technical and clinical validation of commercial automated volumetric MRI tools for dementia diagnosis-a systematic review.Neuroradiology · 2021Pooled it
- Validation of Compressed Sensing Accelerated Magnetization Prepared Rapid Acquisition Gradient Echo for Fast and Reliable Brain Volume Measurement.Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.) · 2026Article
- An automated quantitative report for multiple sclerosis using only 3D T2-fluid-attenuated inversion recovery MRI.Neuroradiology · 2026Article
- The influence of sample size and covariate distributions on neuroanatomical normative modeling.eLife · 2026Article
- InnerEye-HS: a disease-agnostic clinical tool for hippocampal segmentation.Brain communications · 2026Article
- AI-enabled multimodal neuroimaging for neurotransmitter mapping in normal aging and age-related disease.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2026Review
- User requirements for quantitative radiological reports in multiple sclerosis.European radiology · 2025Article
- Radiological Reporting of Brain Atrophy in MRI: Real-Life Comparison Between Narrative Reports, Semiquantitative Scales and Automated Software-Based Volumetry.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Personalizing progressive changes to brain structure in Alzheimer's disease using normative modeling.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2024Article
- Artificial Intelligence and Multiple Sclerosis.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2024Review
- Clinical Evaluation of a Quantitative Imaging Biomarker Supporting Radiological Assessment of Hippocampal Sclerosis.Clinical neuroradiology · 2023Article
- Multi-class glioma segmentation on real-world data with missing MRI sequences: comparison of three deep learning algorithms.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Healthy brain aging and delayed dementia in Texas rural elderly.Ageing research reviews · 2023Review
- Challenges of implementing computer-aided diagnostic models for neuroimages in a clinical setting.NPJ digital medicine · 2023Review
- Personalising Alzheimer's Disease progression using brain atrophy markers.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2023Article
- Revealing Individual Neuroanatomical Heterogeneity in Alzheimer Disease Using Neuroanatomical Normative Modeling.Neurology · 2023Article
- Normative models for neuroimaging markers: Impact of model selection, sample size and evaluation criteria.NeuroImage · 2023Article
- Real world validation of an AI-based CT hemorrhage detection tool.Frontiers in neurology · 2023Article
- Convolutional Neural Network Techniques for Brain Tumor Classification (from 2015 to 2022): Review, Challenges, and Future Perspectives.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
There are numerous challenges to identifying, developing and implementing quantitative techniques for use in clinical radiology, suggesting the need for a common translational pathway. We developed the quantitative neuroradiology initiative (QNI), as a model framework for the technical and clinical validation necessary to embed automated segmentation and other image quantification software into the clinical neuroradiology workflow. We hypothesize that quantification will support reporters with clinically relevant measures contextualized with normative data, increase the precision of longitudinal comparisons, and generate more consistent reporting across levels of radiologists' experience. The QNI framework comprises the following steps: (1) establishing an area of clinical need and identifying the appropriate proven imaging biomarker(s) for the disease in question; (2) developing a method for automated analysis of these biomarkers, by designing an algorithm and compiling reference data; (3) communicating the results via an intuitive and accessible quantitative report; (4) technically and clinically validating the proposed tool pre-use; (5) integrating the developed analysis pipeline into the clinical reporting workflow; and (6) performing in-use evaluation. We will use current radiology practice in dementia as an example, where radiologists have established visual rating scales to describe the degree and pattern of atrophy they detect. These can be helpful, but are somewhat subjective and coarse classifiers, suffering from floor and ceiling limitations. Meanwhile, several imaging biomarkers relevant to dementia diagnosis and management have been proposed in the literature; some clinically approved radiology software tools exist but in general, these have not undergone rigorous clinical validation in high volume or in tertiary dementia centres. The QNI framework aims to address this need. Quantitative image analysis is developing apace within the research domain. Translating quantitative techniques into the clinical setting presents significant challenges, which must be addressed to meet the increasing demand for accurate, timely and impactful clinical imaging services.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.