Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31368762›Full record

ArticleDevelopmental psychology2019

Midlife reversibility of early-established biobehavioral risk factors: A research agenda.

David Reiss, Lisbeth Nielsen, Keith Godfrey, Bruce McEwen, Christine Power, Teresa Seeman, Stephen Suomi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Developmental psychology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. A biosocial return to race? A cautionary view for the postgenomic era.American journal of human biology : the official journal of the Human Biology Council · 2022
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

David ReissChild Study Center.
Lisbeth NielsenDivision of Social and Behavioral Research, National Institute on Aging.
Keith GodfreyMRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, University of Southampton.
Bruce McEwenLaboratory of Neuroendocrinology, The Rockefeller University.
Christine PowerGreat Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London.
Teresa SeemanDivision of Geriatrics, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles.
Stephen SuomiLaboratory of Comparative Ethology, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development.

Funding

Strategies to Advance the National Research Council's Agenda on Minority AgingR13AG023033 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI GUERRERO, LOURDES, POURAT, NADEREH · 2003 to 2023
$1000k
Interdisciplinary Research Network on Early Adversity & Later Life ReversibilityU24AG047867 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI GODFREY, KEITH, MCEWEN, BRUCE S. · 2014 to 2018
$954k
Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research CouncilEuropean Union's Erasmus + Capacity-Building ENeASEA ProjectNational Institute for Health ResearchNational Institute for Health Research; Great Ormond Street Hospital Biomedical Research CentreNational Institute for Health Research; Southampton Biomedical Research CentreNational Institutes of Health; National Institute on AgingNIA NIH HHS R13 AG023033NIA NIH HHS U24 AG047867Seventh Framework ProgrammeUnited Kingdom Economic and Social Research CouncilUnited Kingdom Medical Research Council
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Epidemiological evidence links exposure to early life adversities-such as childhood maltreatment-with impaired health and well-being in adulthood. Since these effects are usually unrecognized or untreated in childhood, preventive and remediating interventions in adults are needed. Our focus on adulthood prompted three major questions. First, does our increased understanding of mechanisms accounting for the long-term effects of early life adversities help delineate underlying dimensions that underscore key similarities and differences among these adversities? Second, can adults accurately report on adversities they experienced in childhood? Third, can we identify malleable risk processes in adulthood that might be targets for preventive intervention? Supported by the National Institute on Aging, the U.K. Economic and Social and the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Councils, a network of researchers in human and animal development addressed these questions through meetings and literature review. A small number of dimensions may adequately distinguish among a range of co-occurring childhood adversities. Widely used adult ascertainments of childhood adversity are poorly related to prospective ascertainment. Strategies for preventive interventions should be aimed both at adults who were actually exposed to adversity as well as those who recall adversity, but the targeted risk processes may be different. Now is an opportune time to support research on adult interventions based on unfolding research on critical periods of sensitivity to adversity in fetal and child development, on improved understanding of risk mechanisms that may persist across the life span, and on new insights on enhancing neuroplasticity in adults. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).

Indexed as

Health StatusAdultAdult Survivors of Child AbuseChronic DiseaseHumansMental DisordersRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsUnited Kingdom

Identifiers

PMID31368762
PMCPMC6907692

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.