ArticleJournal of abnormal psychology2019
The registration continuum in clinical science: A guide toward transparent practices.
Article in Journal of abnormal psychology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
29 citing papers in PubMed.
- HabitWalk: A micro-randomized trial to understand and promote habit formation in physical activity.Applied psychology. Health and well-being · 2025Trial
- Automatic Imitation in Comorbid PTSD & Alcohol Use Disorder and Controls: an RCT of Intranasal Oxytocin.Psychoneuroendocrinology · 2020Trial
- Improving science will require more than just training.Clinical psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science · 2026Article
- The effect of incentive type on data quality and quantity in an experience sampling study in a student population.Behavior research methods · 2026Article
- Toward an idiographic understanding of the role of sleep-mood dynamics in adolescents' internalizing symptoms.JCPP advances · 2026Article
- A bibliometric analysis of preprints in traditional, complementary, and integrative medicine research.Medicine · 2026Article
- Childhood threat exposure and poor emotional awareness predict neural correlates of emotion regulation in adolescent girls.Emotion (Washington, D.C.) · 2026Article
- Affective Forecasting Accuracy in Everyday Life.Affective science · 2026Article
- Open science practices in personality disorder journals.Personality disorders · 2026Article
- Planned versus Unplanned Daily Substance Use among Sexual Minority Youth: The Moderating Role of Social Norms.Clinical psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science · 2025Article
- Fabla: A voice-based ecological assessment method for securely collecting spoken responses to researcher questions.Behavior research methods · 2025Article
- Feasibility of Collecting and Linking Digital Phenotyping, Clinical, and Genetics Data for Mental Health Research: Pilot Observational Study.JMIR formative research · 2025Observational
- The temporal trajectories of habit decay in daily life: An intensive longitudinal study on four health-risk behaviors.Applied psychology. Health and well-being · 2025Article
- A template and tutorial for preregistering studies using passive smartphone measures.Behavior research methods · 2024Article
- The bioinformatics landscape in environmental omics: Lessons from a national ELIXIR survey.iScience · 2024Article
- Changes in adolescents' daily-life solitary experiences during the COVID-19 pandemic: an experience sampling study.BMC public health · 2024Article
- The devil is in the details: Advancing our collective understanding of naturalistic developmental behavioral interventions.Autism research : official journal of the International Society for Autism Research · 2024Article
- Acceptance and Commitment Therapy Processes and Mediation: Challenges and How to Address Them.Behavior therapy · 2023Article
- Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Clinical scientists can use a continuum of registration efforts that vary in their disclosure and timing relative to data collection and analysis. Broadly speaking, registration benefits investigators by offering stronger, more powerful tests of theory with particular methods in tandem with better control of long-run false positive error rates. Registration helps clinical researchers in thinking through tensions between bandwidth and fidelity that surround recruiting participants, defining clinical phenotypes, handling comorbidity, treating missing data, and analyzing rich and complex data. In particular, registration helps record and justify the reasons behind specific study design decisions, though it also provides the opportunity to register entire decision trees with specific endpoints. Creating ever more faithful registrations and standard operating procedures may offer alternative methods of judging a clinical investigator's scientific skill and eminence because study registration increases the transparency of clinical researchers' work. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.