Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31368492›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical entomology2020

Reported County-Level Distribution of the American Dog Tick (Acari: Ixodidae) in the Contiguous United States.

Aine Lehane, Christina Parise, Colleen Evans, Lorenza Beati, William L Nicholson, Rebecca J Eisen

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical entomology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Newer Surveillance Data Extends our Understanding of the Niche ofVector borne and zoonotic diseases (Larchmont, N.Y.) · 2023
    Article
  7. Detection ofJournal of veterinary research · 2023
    Article
  8. Newer Surveillance Data Extends our Understanding of the Niche ofbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Identification ofVector borne and zoonotic diseases (Larchmont, N.Y.) · 2021
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Aine LehaneBacterial Diseases Branch, Division of Vector-Borne Diseases, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Fort Collins, CO.
Christina PariseBacterial Diseases Branch, Division of Vector-Borne Diseases, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Fort Collins, CO.
Colleen EvansU.S. National Tick Collection, Institute for Coastal Plain Science, Georgia Southern University, Statesboro, GA.
Lorenza BeatiU.S. National Tick Collection, Institute for Coastal Plain Science, Georgia Southern University, Statesboro, GA.
William L NicholsonRickettsial Zoonoses Branch, NE.
Rebecca J EisenBacterial Diseases Branch, Division of Vector-Borne Diseases, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Fort Collins, CO.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention · USGeorgia Southern University · USNational Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases · US

Funding

Intramural CDC HHS CC999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the United States, tick-borne diseases are increasing in incidence and cases are reported over an expanding geographical area. Avoiding tick bites is a key strategy in tick-borne disease prevention, and this requires current and accurate information on where humans are at risk for exposure to ticks. Based on a review of published literature and records in the U.S. National Tick Collection and National Ecological Observatory Network databases, we compiled an updated county-level map showing the reported distribution of the American dog tick, Dermacentor variabilis (Say). We show that this vector of the bacterial agents causing Rocky Mountain spotted fever and tularemia is widely distributed, with records derived from 45 states across the contiguous United States. However, within these states, county-level records of established tick populations are limited. Relative to the range of suitable habitat for this tick, our data imply that D. variabilis is currently underreported in the peer-reviewed literature, highlighting a need for improved surveillance and documentation of existing tick records.

Indexed as

Animal DistributionDermacentorAnimalsUnited StatesAmerican dog tickDermacentor variabilisFrancisella tularensisRickettsia rickettsiitick surveillance

Identifiers

PMID31368492
PMCPMC8911316
OpenAlexW2964883002

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.