ReviewCurrent gastroenterology reports2019
Classifying Enteral Nutrition: Tailored for Clinical Practice.
Review in Current gastroenterology reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.
- Association between enteral formula type and nutritional failure in critically ill children: A single-center retrospective study.European journal of pediatrics · 2026Article
- Clinical and Gut Microbiome Characteristics of Medically Complex Patients Receiving Blenderized Tube Feeds vs. Standard Enteral Feeds.Nutrients · 2025Article
- Host-pathobiont interactions in Crohn's disease.Nature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2025Review
- Fiber-deficient diet inhibits colitis through the regulation of the niche and metabolism of a gut pathobiont.Cell host & microbe · 2023Article
- Comparison of micronutrients in adult enteral formulas widely used in clinical practice.Food science & nutrition · 2023Article
- Efficacy of Crohn's disease exclusion diet in treatment -naïve children and children progressed on biological therapy: a retrospective chart review.BMC gastroenterology · 2023Article
- Review
- Loss of Eicosapentaenoic Acid (EPA) after Retort Sterilization of the EPA-BCAA Fortified Complete Nutrition Drink.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Glycemic Management of Hospitalized Patients Receiving Nutrition Support.Diabetes spectrum : a publication of the American Diabetes Association · 2022Article
- Nutraceuticals for the Treatment of IBD: Current Progress and Future Directions.Frontiers in nutrition · 2022Review
- Re-examining chemically defined liquid diets through the lens of the microbiome.Nature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2021Review
- Nutritional Therapy Strategies in Pediatric Crohn's Disease.Nutrients · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewTo discuss the different forms of enteral nutrition, while outlining available evidence for its use in specific conditions and how enteral nutrition composition may or may not influence relevant outcomes. RECENT
findingsEnteral nutrition formulas were originally conceived as a liquid form of nutrition for individuals who otherwise could not consume adequate calories through solid food. Over time, the emergence of specialty formulas marketed to benefit specific diseases or conditions has led to a broad range of potentially confusing options. While most options have theoretical benefit for their marketed conditions, the evidence demonstrating practical benefit is not consistent. Overall, the certainty of evidence for specialty formulas remains low or very low. In most instances, one could begin with standard polymeric formula, except in cases where disease-specific formulas are recommended. Much research is nonetheless still needed to clarify whether some disease-specific formulas are truly beneficial or merely theoretical features.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.