Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31368053›Full record

ArticleActa neurochirurgica2019

Challenging the osseous component of sphenoorbital meningiomas.

Svenja Maschke, Mauricio Martínez-Moreno, Alexander Micko, Matthias Millesi, Georgi Minchev, Ammar Mallouhi, Engelbert Knosp, Stefan Wolfsberger

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta neurochirurgica, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Meningiomas with CNS invasion.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2023
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Spheno-Orbital Meningiomas: Optimizing Visual Outcome.Journal of neurosciences in rural practice · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Svenja MaschkeDepartment of Neurosurgery, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1080, Vienna, Austria.
Mauricio Martínez-MorenoDepartment of Neurosurgery, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1080, Vienna, Austria.
Alexander MickoDepartment of Neurosurgery, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1080, Vienna, Austria.
Matthias MillesiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1080, Vienna, Austria.
Georgi MinchevDepartment of Neurosurgery, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1080, Vienna, Austria.
Ammar MallouhiDepartment of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1080, Vienna, Austria.
Engelbert KnospDepartment of Neurosurgery, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1080, Vienna, Austria.
Stefan WolfsbergerDepartment of Neurosurgery, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1080, Vienna, Austria. stefan.wolfsberger@meduniwien.ac.at.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIntraosseous growth is a unique feature of sphenoorbital meningiomas (SOM). Its close relation to neurovascular structures limits complete surgical resection and possibly contributes to the high recurrence rate.

objectiveTo evaluate the growth behavior of intraosseous remnants and develop a protocol for precise intraoperative visualization of intraosseous SOM.

methodsWe included 31 patients operated for SOM from 2004 to 2017. The growth velocity of the intraosseous tumor component was volumetrically calculated in 20 cases. To improve accuracy of image guidance, we implemented a specialized bone surface-based registration algorithm. For intraoperative bone visualization, we included CT in multimodality continuous image guidance in 23 patients. The extent of resection (EOR) was compared with a standard MR-only navigation group (n = 8).

resultsIn 11/20 cases (55%), a progressive regrowth of the intraosseous SOM remnant was noted during a mean follow-up of 52 months (range 20-132 months). We observed a mean increase of 6.2 cm

conclusionQuantitative assessment of the biological behavior of intraosseous remnants revealed a continuous slow growth rate independent of the soft tumor component of more than half of SOM. According to our data, application of a multimodal image guidance provided high accuracy and significantly increased the resection rate of the intraosseous component of SOM.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAlgorithmsFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMeningeal NeoplasmsMeningiomaMiddle AgedOrbital NeoplasmsSphenoid BoneBone infiltrationImage guidanceMeningiomaSkull baseSphenoorbital meningioma

Identifiers

PMID31368053
PMCPMC6820812

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.