Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31368029›Full record

ReviewSleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung2020

Pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions to promote sleep in intensive care units: a critical review.

Rogleson Albuquerque Brito, Soraya Maria do Nascimento Rebouças Viana, Beatriz Amorim Beltrão, Clarissa Bentes de Araújo Magalhães, Veralice Meireles Sales de Bruin, Pedro Felipe Carvalhedo de Bruin

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Sleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Sleep physiology and critical illness: A narrative review.Journal of the Intensive Care Society · 2026
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Is there a role for melatonin in the ICU?The Southern African journal of critical care : the official journal of the Critical Care Society · 2021
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Rogleson Albuquerque BritoLaboratory of Sleep and Biological Rhythms, Federal University of Ceará, Fortaleza, Ceará, Brazil.
Soraya Maria do Nascimento Rebouças VianaLaboratory of Sleep and Biological Rhythms, Federal University of Ceará, Fortaleza, Ceará, Brazil.
Beatriz Amorim BeltrãoWalter Cantidio University Hospital, Federal University of Ceará, Fortaleza, Ceará, Brazil.
Clarissa Bentes de Araújo MagalhãesLaboratory of Sleep and Biological Rhythms, Federal University of Ceará, Fortaleza, Ceará, Brazil.
Veralice Meireles Sales de BruinLaboratory of Sleep and Biological Rhythms, Federal University of Ceará, Fortaleza, Ceará, Brazil.
Pedro Felipe Carvalhedo de BruinLaboratory of Sleep and Biological Rhythms, Federal University of Ceará, Fortaleza, Ceará, Brazil. pedrobruin@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9694-1523
Universidade Federal do Ceará · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAlthough it is generally recognized that poor sleep is common in the intensive care unit (ICU), it is still unclear which interventions can effectively improve sleep in this setting. In this review, we critically analyze the various pharmacological and non-pharmacological measures that have been proposed to tackle this problem.

methodsA search of MEDLINE/PubMed, SciELO, and the Brazilian Virtual Library in Health (LILACS and BNDEF) databases was performed. Results were reviewed and 41 articles on pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions to promote sleep in ICU were analyzed.

resultsNon-pharmacological interventions including eye mask and earplugs, bundles to reduce noise and lighting, and organization of patient care were shown to improve subjective and objective sleep quality, although the level of evidence was considered low. Assist-control ventilation was associated with a greater objective sleep quality than spontaneous modes, such as pressure support ventilation and proportional assist ventilation. Among pharmacological interventions, a moderate level of evidence was found for oral melatonin, with increases in both objective and subjective sleep quality. Continuous nocturnal infusion of dexmedetomidine was reported to increase sleep efficiency and favorably modify the sleep pattern, although evidence level was moderate to low.

conclusionsSeveral non-pharmacological and pharmacological measures can be helpful to improve sleep in critical patients. Further high-quality studies are needed to strengthen the evidence base.

Indexed as

Intensive Care UnitsLiquid VentilationDexmedetomidineHumansInfusions, IntravenousSleep Aids, PharmaceuticalSleep Initiation and Maintenance DisordersTreatment OutcomeDexmedetomidineSleep Aids, PharmaceuticalCircadian rhythmIntensive care unitsSleepSleep deprivationSleep wake disorders

Identifiers

PMID31368029
OpenAlexW2965375085

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.