Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31367918›Full record

ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2020

Longitudinal course and predictors of communication and affect management self-efficacy among women newly diagnosed with gynecological cancers.

Sharon L Manne, Deborah A Kashy, David W Kissane, Melissa Ozga, Shannon Myers Virtue, Carolyn J Heckman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Mediating Effect of Self-Efficacy Between Self-Perceived Burden and End-of-Life Communication Difficulties in Cancer Patients.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sharon L ManneRutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, 195 Little Albany Street, New Brunswick, NJ, 08901, USA. Sharon.Manne@Rutgers.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9304-7822
Deborah A KashyMichigan State University, East Lansing, MI, 48824, USA.
David W KissaneUniversity of Notre Dame Australia, Fremantle, WA, 6160, Australia.
Melissa OzgaMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York City, USA.
Shannon Myers VirtueHelen F. Graham Cancer Center, Newark, DE, 19713, USA.
Carolyn J HeckmanRutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, 195 Little Albany Street, New Brunswick, NJ, 08901, USA.

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
PSYCHOLOGICAL INTERVENTION FOR OVARIAN CANCER PATIENTSR01CA085566 · NCI · UNIV OF MED/DENT NJ-R W JOHNSON MED SCH · PI MANNE, SHARON L · 2000 to 2014
$4.8M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NCI NIH HHS R01 CA085566NIH HHS CA085566
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveSelf-efficacy is an important psychological resource to assist people in managing chronic illness and has been associated with psychological outcomes among patients coping with cancer. Little is known about the course of self-efficacy among gynecological cancer patients coping with cancer and the sociodemographic, medical, and psychological factors that are associated with the course of self-efficacy among these patients.

methodsOne hundred twenty-five women recently diagnosed with gynecological cancer completed a measure of communication and affective management self-efficacy at baseline, 5 weeks, 9 weeks, 6 months, 1 year, and 18 months post-baseline. Participants also completed measures of functional impairment, holding back, perceived unsupportive behaviors of family and friends, emotional expressivity, cancer concerns, depressive symptoms, cancer-specific intrusions and avoidance, problem-solving, and positive reappraisal coping.

resultsGrowth curve modeling suggested that women varied considerably in their average reports of self-efficacy and varied with regard to their linear trajectories of self-efficacy over time. Average affect management self-efficacy increased significantly over time. Greater functional impairment, more holding back, more unsupportive responses from friends and family, less emotional expressivity, more cancer concerns, depression, intrusions, or avoidance predicted lower average self-efficacy over time. Women who were less emotionally expressive or held back sharing concerns less reported lower self-efficacy which increased over time.

conclusionsIt will be important for providers to identify gynecological cancer patients who report low ability to communicate feelings and needs and manage emotional reactions to cancer and offer them interventions which bolster self-efficacy.

Indexed as

CommunicationSelf EfficacyAdaptation, PsychologicalAdultAgedAged, 80 and overDepressionDepressive DisorderExpressed EmotionFemaleGenital Neoplasms, FemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMiddle AgedProblem SolvingRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicEmotional expressivityGynecological cancerHolding backSelf-efficacy

Identifiers

PMID31367918
PMCPMC6994366

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.