Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31367888›Full record

ArticleInternational urogynecology journal2020

Current trends in urogynecological surgeries in Poland.

Katarzyna Skorupska, Tomasz Rechberger, Michał Bogusiewicz, Aneta Adamiak-Godlewska, Agnieszka Kwiatkowska, Paweł Miotła

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International urogynecology journal, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Katarzyna Skorupska2nd Department of Gynecology, Medical University in Lublin, ul. Jaczewskiego 8, 20-954, Lublin, Poland. kasiaperzylo@hotmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0146-0530
Tomasz Rechberger2nd Department of Gynecology, Medical University in Lublin, ul. Jaczewskiego 8, 20-954, Lublin, Poland.
Michał Bogusiewicz2nd Department of Gynecology, Medical University in Lublin, ul. Jaczewskiego 8, 20-954, Lublin, Poland.
Aneta Adamiak-Godlewska2nd Department of Gynecology, Medical University in Lublin, ul. Jaczewskiego 8, 20-954, Lublin, Poland.
Agnieszka Kwiatkowska2nd Department of Gynecology, Medical University in Lublin, ul. Jaczewskiego 8, 20-954, Lublin, Poland.
Paweł Miotła2nd Department of Gynecology, Medical University in Lublin, ul. Jaczewskiego 8, 20-954, Lublin, Poland.
Medical University of Lublin · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introduction and hypothesisPelvic organ prolapse (POP) treatment has become more common in the world's health care systems, and the demand for pelvic floor disorder rehabilitation has been projected to increase by 35% between 2010 and 2030. Restitution procedures vary, but after the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) notifications, the global use of mesh in vaginal surgeries has significantly decreased. The aim of this study is to show trends in urogynecological surgeries in Poland.

methodsRetrospective analysis was performed of data obtained between 2009 and 2017 from the National Health Fund Information Centre website. Vaginal hysterectomies (VH), POP and urinary incontinence (UI) surgeries were considered.

resultsIn the study, 327,294 hospitalizations between 2009 and 2017 were considered: 29,821 VH, 265,147 POP and 53,328 UI procedures. Between 2009 and 2015, a rapid increase in the number of POP procedures was observed (r

conclusionsThe impact of FDA notifications has been observed in Poland as a decrease in TVM surgeries.

Indexed as

Gynecologic Surgical ProceduresPelvic Organ ProlapseFemaleHumansPolandRetrospective StudiesSurgical MeshFDA safety communicationProlapse surgery trendsUrinary incontinence surgery trends

Identifiers

PMID31367888
PMCPMC7363671
OpenAlexW2966102423

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.