Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31367867›Full record

Observational studyJournal of general internal medicine2019

Statin Dosing Instructions, Medication Adherence, and Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol: a Cohort Study of Incident Statin Users.

Zachary A Marcum, Hsiao-Ching Huang, Robert J Romanelli

Open access · bronzeAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Journal of general internal medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Zachary A MarcumDepartment of Pharmacy, School of Pharmacy, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA. zmarcum@uw.edu.
Hsiao-Ching HuangSutter Health, Palo Alto Medical Foundation Research Institute, Palo Alto, CA, USA.
Robert J RomanelliSutter Health, Palo Alto Medical Foundation Research Institute, Palo Alto, CA, USA.
Palo Alto Institute · USUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

Antihypertensives and the Aging BrainK76AG059929 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI MARCUM, ZACHARY ADAM · 2019 to 2021
$694k
NIA NIH HHS K76 AG059929
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRobust evidence is lacking on optimal timing of statin administration and its impact on patient outcomes.

objectiveThis study aims to evaluate among incident statin users the relationship between those prescribed evening vs. daily dosing instructions, medication adherence, and changes in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-c).

designThis is an observational cohort study at Sutter Health, a community-based healthcare system, 2010-2016.

participantsPatients were ≥ 35 years of age as of the first statin prescription (baseline), with 12 to 36 months of electronic health record activity before and after baseline. Incident use was defined as no statin prescription in 12 months prior to baseline. MAIN MEASURES: Differences in medication adherence (proportion of days covered ≥ 0.80) over 12 months from baseline and mean change in LDL-c between 12 and 24 months from baseline were measured using regression modeling, adjusting for baseline demographics and clinical, prescriber, and statin characteristics. KEY

resultsAmong 31,252 patients with valid statin prescriptions between 2010 and 2016, 5099 eligible incident statin users (mean age, 63 years) were identified, of whom 53% were prescribed evening and 47% daily dosing instructions. No difference in likelihood of statin adherence over 12 months was observed for evening vs. daily dosing (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 0.90; 95% CI 0.75, 1.08). No differences were observed in mean change in LDL-c (adjusted mean difference 1.42 mg/dL; 95% CI - 1.02, 3.89) or likelihood of attaining LDL-c < 70 mg/dL (adjusted OR 0.83; 95% CI 0.67, 1.04) for evening vs. daily dosing over a mean of 19 months follow-up.

conclusionsAmong incident statin users from a real-world clinical setting, those with daily and evening dosing instructions had similar adherence rates and mean changes in LDL-c. Given potential clinical equipoise for evening and daily dosing, clinicians should consider patient-tailored statin dosing instructions to reduce potentially unnecessary regimen complexity.

Indexed as

Drug MonitoringAgedCholesterol, LDLCohort StudiesDrug LabelingFemaleHumansHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase InhibitorsMaleManaged Care ProgramsMiddle AgedCholesterol, LDLHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitorsclinical epidemiologymedication adherencepharmacoepidemiology

Identifiers

PMID31367867
PMCPMC6848741
OpenAlexW2964695775

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.