ArticleWorld journal of surgery2019
Surgical Notes: To Play or Not to Play.
Article in World journal of surgery, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Randomized cross-over trial comparing stress responses amongst undergraduates and surgeons with and without background music during simulated surgery.Scientific reports · 2025Trial
- A qualitative exploration of the perceptions of music use by healthcare professionals in the operating theatre (the BACH study).Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionMusic is any sound that is perceived as pleasingly harmonious. The link between music and healthcare can be traced long back in the history of mankind. Thus, our study aimed at assessing the impact of different genre of music on the cognition functioning, memory and attention levels of the surgeons. MATERIALS AND
methodsIt was a single-arm interventional trial assessing 45 surgeons from different specialities. Each participant was expected to do 5 sets of tasks, one set each for the 5 music tracks played. Each task set further contained 5 different types of tasks, namely trail marking, jigsaw puzzle, backward counting, comprehension and memory game using cards. The 5 music tracks included ambient OR noise, music of personal preference, western classical, heavy metal and pop music. Scores were assigned for each task and compared.
resultsThe total score for music of personal choice was much less (19.68) when compared to the other genre and that for pop was the highest (25.03). Memory card tests and backward counting (tests of short-term memory) were comparatively better with music of personal choice. However, trail marking (test of speed) and jigsaw puzzle and comprehension tests (tests of complex neurological functions) were least performed when music of personal choice was played.
conclusionMusic of choice may help in short-term memory recall, but an over-familiarity with the music played can serve as a distractor thus affecting the speed and accuracy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
31367781What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.