Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31367636›Full record

ArticleERJ open research2019

Home-based tuberculosis contact investigation in Uganda: a household randomised trial.

J Lucian Davis, Patricia Turimumahoro, Amanda J Meyer, Irene Ayakaka, Emma Ochom, Joseph Ggita, David Mark, Diana Babirye, Daniel Ayen Okello, Frank Mugabe and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ERJ open research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. eHealth in TB clinical management.The international journal of tuberculosis and lung disease : the official journal of the International Union against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease · 2022
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Household Contact Tracing With Intensified Tuberculosis and Human Immunodeficiency Virus Screening in South Africa: A Cluster-Randomized Trial.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2022
    Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Tuberculosis contact tracing, Angola.Bulletin of the World Health Organization · 2024
    Article
  12. Estimating the Cost of Delivering Tobacco Cessation Intervention Package at Noncommunicable Disease Clinics in Two Districts of North India.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. The impact of time at home on potential yield of home-based TB contact investigation.The international journal of tuberculosis and lung disease : the official journal of the International Union against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease · 2023
    Article
  18. Tuberculosis care models for children and adolescents: a scoping review.Bulletin of the World Health Organization · 2022
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

J Lucian DavisEpidemiology of Microbial Diseases, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8629-9992
Patricia TurimumahoroUganda Tuberculosis Implementation Research Consortium, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
Amanda J MeyerEpidemiology of Microbial Diseases, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2318-1783
Irene AyakakaUganda Tuberculosis Implementation Research Consortium, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
Emma OchomUganda Tuberculosis Implementation Research Consortium, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
Joseph GgitaUganda Tuberculosis Implementation Research Consortium, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
David MarkUganda Tuberculosis Implementation Research Consortium, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
Diana BabiryeUganda Tuberculosis Implementation Research Consortium, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
Daniel Ayen OkelloKampala Capital City Authority, Kampala, Uganda.
Frank MugabeUganda National Tuberculosis and Leprosy Programme, Uganda Ministry of Health, Kampala, Uganda.
Elizabeth FairDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Eric VittinghoffDept of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Mari Armstrong-HoughEpidemiology of Microbial Diseases, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT, USA.
David DowdyUganda Tuberculosis Implementation Research Consortium, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
Adithya CattamanchiUganda Tuberculosis Implementation Research Consortium, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
Jessica E HabererDept of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital Global Health, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Achilles KatambaUganda Tuberculosis Implementation Research Consortium, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.

Funding

Yale Clinical and Translational Science Award (U Component)UL1TR001863 · NCATS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI John H. Krystal, LUCILA OHNO-MACHADO · 2016 to 2026
$102.9M
Mobile Health for Implementation of Home-based TB Contact Investigation in UgandaR01AI104824 · NIAID · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI DAVIS, JOHN LUCIAN · 2013 to 2023
$6.7M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001863NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI104824
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe World Health Organization (WHO) recommends household tuberculosis (TB) contact investigation in low-income countries, but most contacts do not complete a full clinical and laboratory evaluation.

methodsWe performed a randomised trial of home-based, SMS-facilitated, household TB contact investigation in Kampala, Uganda. Community health workers (CHWs) visited homes of index patients with pulmonary TB to screen household contacts for TB. Entire households were randomly allocated to clinic (standard-of-care) or home (intervention) evaluation. In the intervention arm, CHWs offered HIV testing to adults; collected sputum from symptomatic contacts and persons living with HIV (PLWHs) if ≥5 years; and transported sputum for microbiologic testing. CHWs referred PLWHs, children <5 years, and anyone unable to complete sputum testing to clinic. Sputum testing results and/or follow-up instructions were returned by automated SMS texts. The primary outcome was completion of a full TB evaluation within 14 days; secondary outcomes were TB and HIV diagnoses and treatments among screened contacts.

resultsThere were 471 contacts of 190 index patients allocated to the intervention and 448 contacts of 182 index patients allocated to the standard-of-care. CHWs identified 190/471 (40%) intervention and 213/448 (48%) standard-of-care contacts requiring TB evaluation. In the intervention arm, CHWs obtained sputum from 35/91 (39%) of sputum-eligible contacts and SMSs were sent to 95/190 (50%). Completion of TB evaluation in the intervention and standard-of-care arms at 14 days (14%

conclusionsHome-based, SMS-facilitated evaluation did not improve completion or yield of household TB contact investigation, likely due to challenges delivering the intervention components.

Identifiers

PMID31367636
PMCPMC6661318

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.