Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31367614›Full record

ReviewWorld journal of clinical cases2019

Intracranial pressure monitoring: Gold standard and recent innovations.

Deb Sanjay Nag, Seelora Sahu, Amlan Swain, Shashi Kant

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in World journal of clinical cases, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 89 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
89citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05593380 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

The Impact of Invasive Intracranial Pressure Monitoring Guided Management on the Functional Outcomes of Patients With Supratentorial Large Volume Cerebral Hemorrhage: An Open Label, Randomized, Controlled, Multi-center Trial (BIATICH)

TypeinterventionalSponsorXiangya Hospital of Central South UniversityRan2022 to 2025Enrolled193ConditionsCerebral Hemorrhage, Hypertensive, Intracranial Hypertension, Monitoring, Critical CareArmsParenchymal Intracranial pressure monitor, Treatment based on clinical and imaging observations
NCT05632302 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

A Pilot Study to Estimate Intracranial Pressure Noninvasively in Traumatic Brain Injury Patients

TypeinterventionalSponsorCrainio LtdaRan2020 to 2021Enrolled40ConditionsTraumatic Brain Injury, Intracranial HypertensionArmsnICP
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

89 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension: Updates on Pathophysiology and Diagnosis.Advances and technical standards in neurosurgery · 2026
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Advancements in Non-Invasive Intracranial Pressure Monitoring via Optic Nerve Sheath Diameter Measurement.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2025
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Prognostic role of quantitative pupillometry in traumatic brain injury: a scoping review.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2025
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

29 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Deb Sanjay NagDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, Tata Main Hospital, Jamshedpur 831001, India. debsanjay@gmail.com.
Seelora SahuDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, Tata Main Hospital, Jamshedpur 831001, India.
Amlan SwainDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, Tata Main Hospital, Jamshedpur 831001, India.
Shashi KantDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, Tata Main Hospital, Jamshedpur 831001, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intracranial pressure monitoring (ICP) is based on the doctrine proposed by Monroe and Kellie centuries ago. With the advancement of technology and science, various invasive and non-invasive modalities of monitoring ICP continue to be developed. An ideal monitor to track ICP should be easy to use, accurate, reliable, reproducible, inexpensive and should not be associated with infection or haemorrhagic complications. Although the transducers connected to the extra ventricular drainage continue to be Gold Standard, its association with the likelihood of infection and haemorrhage have led to the search for alternate non-invasive methods of monitoring ICP. While Camino transducers, Strain gauge micro transducer based ICP monitoring devices and the Spiegelberg ICP monitor are the emerging technology in invasive ICP monitoring, optic nerve sheath diameter measurement, venous opthalmodynamometry, tympanic membrane displacement, tissue resonance analysis, tonometry, acoustoelasticity, distortion-product oto-acoustic emissions, trans cranial doppler, electro encephalogram, near infra-red spectroscopy, pupillometry, anterior fontanelle pressure monitoring, skull elasticity, jugular bulb monitoring, visual evoked response and radiological based assessment of ICP are the non-invasive methods which are assessed against the gold standard.

Indexed as

Craniocerebral traumaIntracranial pressure increaseSubarachnoid hemorrhages

Identifiers

PMID31367614
PMCPMC6658373

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.