Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31367562›Full record

ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2019

A comparison of ultra-high-resolution CT target scan versus conventional CT target reconstruction in the evaluation of ground-glass-nodule-like lung adenocarcinoma.

Yanyan Zhu, Dailun Hou, Meihong Lan, Xiaoli Sun, Xiangxing Ma

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. [Expert Consensus for Thermal Ablation of Pulmonary Subsolid Nodules (2021 Edition)].Zhongguo fei ai za zhi = Chinese journal of lung cancer · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Yanyan ZhuDivision of Computed Tomography, Department of Radiology, Shandong University School of Medicine, Shandong Provincial Third Hospital, Jinan 250031, China.
Dailun HouDepartment of Radiology, Beijing Chest Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 101149, China.
Meihong LanDepartment of Radiology, Shandong Chest Hospital, Jinan 250101, China.
Xiaoli SunDepartment of Computed Tomography, Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Ninth Clinical Medical College of Peking University, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100038, China.
Xiangxing MaDepartment of Radiology, Qilu Hospital, Shandong University, Jinan 250012, China.
Capital Medical University · CNQilu Hospital of Shandong University · CNShandong Chest Hospital · CNShandong Provincial Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe aim of this study was to determine whether the clinical value of scanned computed tomography (CT) images is higher when using ultra-high-resolution CT (U-HRCT) target scanning than conventional CT target reconstruction scanning in the evaluation of ground-glass-nodule (GGN)-like lung adenocarcinoma.

methodsA total of 91 consecutive patients with isolated GGN-like lung adenocarcinoma were included in this study from April 2017 to June 2018. U-HRCT and conventional CT scans were conducted in all enrolled patients. Two experienced thoracic radiologists independently assessed image quality and made diagnoses. Based on the pathological results, the accuracies of U-HRCT target scanning and conventional CT target reconstruction for detecting morphological features on CT, including spiculation of GGNs, bronchial vascular bundles, solid components in the nodules, burr, vacuole, air bronchial signs, and fissure distortion, were calculated. All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 17.0 software. Enumeration data were tested using the Chi-square test. A P value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

resultsWhen both techniques were compared with the pathological findings, the detection rate for CT images obtained using U-HRCT target scanning and conventional CT target reconstruction with regard to the spiculation of GGNs, bronchial vascular bundles, and solid components in the nodules were 78%

conclusionsWhen viewing GGNs, the detection rate was higher for U-HRCT target scanning than for conventional CT target reconstruction, and this improvement significantly enhanced the diagnostic accuracy of early lung adenocarcinoma.

Indexed as

conventional CT target reconstructionground-glass opacitylung adenocarcinomaUltra-high-resolution CT target scan (U-HRCT target scan)

Identifiers

PMID31367562
PMCPMC6629564
OpenAlexW2954931739

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.