Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31367487›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2019

Measuring the dispersion of rainfall using Bayesian confidence intervals for coefficient of variation of delta-lognormal distribution: a study from Thailand.

Noppadon Yosboonruang, Sa-Aat Niwitpong, Suparat Niwitpong

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Noppadon YosboonruangDepartment of Applied Statistics, Faculty of Applied Science, King Mongkut's University of Technology North Bangkok, Bangkok, Thailand.
Sa-Aat NiwitpongDepartment of Applied Statistics, Faculty of Applied Science, King Mongkut's University of Technology North Bangkok, Bangkok, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0001-8269-3397
Suparat NiwitpongDepartment of Applied Statistics, Faculty of Applied Science, King Mongkut's University of Technology North Bangkok, Bangkok, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0003-3059-1131

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Since rainfall data series often contain zero values and thus follow a delta-lognormal distribution, the coefficient of variation is often used to illustrate the dispersion of rainfall in a number of areas and so is an important tool in statistical inference for a rainfall data series. Therefore, the aim in this paper is to establish new confidence intervals for a single coefficient of variation for delta-lognormal distributions using Bayesian methods based on the independent Jeffreys', the Jeffreys' Rule, and the uniform priors compared with the fiducial generalized confidence interval. The Bayesian methods are constructed with either equitailed confidence intervals or the highest posterior density interval. The performance of the proposed confidence intervals was evaluated using coverage probabilities and expected lengths via Monte Carlo simulations. The results indicate that the Bayesian equitailed confidence interval based on the independent Jeffreys' prior outperformed the other methods. Rainfall data recorded in national parks in July 2015 and in precipitation stations in August 2018 in Nan province, Thailand are used to illustrate the efficacy of the proposed methods using a real-life dataset.

Indexed as

Bayesian methodCoefficient of variationCoverage probabilityDelta-lognormal distributionFiducial generalized confidence intervalHighest posterior density

Identifiers

PMID31367487
PMCPMC6657683

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.