ArticlePsychologica Belgica2019
Recognition Times for 54 Thousand Dutch Words: Data from the Dutch Crowdsourcing Project.
Article in Psychologica Belgica, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- The English Pseudoword Lexicon Project (EPLeP): A resource for investigating pseudoword processing.Behavior research methods · 2026Article
- The Arabic Lexicon Project: Lexical decision data for 10,000 Modern Standard Arabic words.Behavior research methods · 2026Article
- Adding volition to word processing: Expected utility norms for 80,000 English words and multiword expressions.Behavior research methods · 2026Article
- Simulating lexical decision times with large language models to supplement megastudies and crowdsourcing.Behavior research methods · 2025Article
- Jiwar: A database and calculator for word neighborhood measures in 40 languages.Behavior research methods · 2025Article
- The Italian Crowdsourcing Project: Visual word recognition times for 130,495 Italian words.Behavior research methods · 2024Article
- Ratings of valence, arousal, happiness, anger, fear, sadness, disgust, and surprise for 24,000 Dutch words.Behavior research methods · 2024Article
- Dutch sensory modality norms.Behavior research methods · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We present a new database of Dutch word recognition times for a total of 54 thousand words, called the Dutch Crowdsourcing Project. The data were collected with an internet vocabulary test. The database is limited to native Dutch speakers. Participants were asked to indicate which words they knew. Their response times were registered, even though the participants were not asked to respond as fast as possible. Still, the response times correlate around .7 with the response times of the Dutch Lexicon Projects for shared words. Also results of virtual experiments indicate that the new response times are a valid addition to the Dutch Lexicon Projects. This not only means that we have useful response times for some 20 thousand extra words, but we now also have data on differences in response latencies as a function of education and age. The new data correspond better to word use in the Netherlands.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.