ArticleNursing open2019
Team composition and staff roles in a hybrid operating room: A prospective study using video observations.
Article in Nursing open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Geriatric Focused ERAS Nursing Practices in Open and Hybrid Aortic Vascular Surgery.Clinical interventions in aging · 2026Article
- The Influence of Age and Experience on Safety Climate Perceptions Among Healthcare Staff in Operating, Interventional Radiology, and Hybrid Operating Rooms: A Cross-Sectional Study.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2026Article
- Smart Operating Room in Digestive Surgery: A Narrative Review.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Effects of Quantitative Nursing Combined with Psychological Intervention in Operating Room on Stress Response, Psychological State, and Prognosis of Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Endometrial Cancer Surgery.Computational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2022Article
- Team composition and staff roles in a hybrid operating room: A prospective study using video observations.Nursing open · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimThe aim of the study was to evaluate team composition and staff roles in a hybrid operating room during endovascular aortic repairs.
designQuantitative descriptive design.
methodsNine endovascular aortic repairs procedures were video-recorded between December 2014 and September 2015. The data analysis involved examining the work process, number of people in the room and categories of staff and their involvement in the procedure.
resultsThe procedures were divided into four phases. The hybrid operating room was most crowded in phase 3 when the skin wound was open. Some staff categories were in the room for the entire procedure even if they were not actively involved. The largest number of people simultaneously in the room was 14.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.