Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31367404›Full record

ArticleNursing open2019

Evidence-based practice integration in hospital wards-The complexities and challenges in achieving evidence-based practice in clinical nursing.

Åste Renolen, Esther Hjälmhult, Sevald Høye, Lars Johan Danbolt, Marit Kirkevold

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nursing open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Åste RenolenInstitute of Health and Society University of Oslo Oslo Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1521-3688
Esther HjälmhultCentre for Evidence-Based Practice Western Norway University of Applied Sciences Bergen Norway.
Sevald HøyeFaculty of Public Health Inland Norway University of Applied Sciences Elverum Norway.
Lars Johan DanboltCentre of Psychology of Religion Innlandet Hospital Trust Ottestad Norway.
Marit KirkevoldInstitute of Health and Society University of Oslo Oslo Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimExploring the processes involved in two different strategies to integrate evidence-based practice into nursing practice.

designClassical grounded theory methodology was used.

methodsData were collected through 90 hr of observation and 4 focus groups among clinical nurses in two different hospital wards.

resultsWe identified a multidimensional evidence-based practice integration framework that illuminates the complexities involved in the integration process. The dimensions were approaches to evidence-based practice, positions of evidence-based practice and levels of evidence-based practice. The interactions between the dimensions gave five combinations; an explicit evidence-based practice performed as a parallel to daily work at the systems level, an implicit evidence-based practice integrated into daily work at the systems level, an explicit evidence-based practice integrated into daily work at the individual level, an explicit evidence-based practice integrated into daily work at the systems level and an implicit evidence-based practice integrated into daily work at the individual level.

Indexed as

clinical practice guidelinesevidence‐based practicehospitalhuddle boardimplementationnursesresearch utilizationwhiteboard

Identifiers

PMID31367404
PMCPMC6650761

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.