Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31367400›Full record

ArticleNursing open2019

Ambulance nurses' experiences of deciding a patient does not require ambulance care.

Tess Backman, Päivi Juuso, Ronja Borg, Åsa Engström

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nursing open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Workplace violence from the ambulance personnel's perspective, a qualitative study.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. The dialogue as decision support; lived experiences of extended collaboration when an ambulance is called.International journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being · 2021
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Tess BackmanAmbulance Care Mora Sweden.
Päivi JuusoDivision of Nursing, Department of Health Science Luleå University of Technology Luleå Sweden.
Ronja BorgVästerås Hospital Region of Västmanland Västerås Sweden.
Åsa EngströmDivision of Nursing, Department of Health Science Luleå University of Technology Luleå Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6244-6401

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo describe ambulance nurses' experience of deciding a patient does not require ambulance care.

designAn inductive, empirical study with a qualitative approach.

methodsData collection was conducted through semi-structured interviews, and collected data were analysed with qualitative manifest content analysis. Data were collected during the spring 2017, and eight ambulance nurses participated.

resultsThe findings are presented in one main category, which is "Not very ill but a difficult decision" with totally three subcategories. The ambulance nurse's experience of making the assessment when the patient has no need for ambulance care is like walking the balance of slack line. This means that the assessment can be both easy and very difficult but something that definitely requires experience, knowledge and dedication.

Indexed as

ambulance careclinical decision‐makingpatient safetyqualitative researchrefusal of care

Identifiers

PMID31367400
PMCPMC6650689

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.