Articlei-Perception
Perceiving Natural Speed in Natural Movies.
Article in i-Perception. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Perceptual judgments for the softness of materials under indentation.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Perceiving Natural Speed in Natural Movies.i-PerceptionArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The visual system uses the physical laws of nature as constraints for perceiving objects and events. Images violating natural laws would therefore tend to be perceived as unnatural. To understand vision's implicit knowledge of natural speed in the real world, we examined visual tolerance to artificial speed deviations in 22 natural movies. For most movies, perception could tolerate deviations from original speed by as much as a factor 2×. However, for movies including human body movements or falling objects, perception only tolerated a significantly narrower range of speed deviations. In general, human observers are poor at judging the naturalness of speed in natural scenes except for events involving gravitational or biological motions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.