ArticleLinguistic approaches to bilingualism2019
Covert Co-Activation of Bilinguals' Non-Target Language: Phonological Competition from Translations.
Article in Linguistic approaches to bilingualism, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Consequences of Bilingual Language Co-Activation for Higher-Order Cognition.Current directions in psychological science · 2025Article
- Language experience influences performance on the NIH Toolbox Cognition Battery: A cluster analysis.Humanities & social sciences communications · 2025Article
- Speakers of different languages remember visual scenes differently.Science advances · 2023Article
- Unpacking the multilingualism continuum: An investigation of language variety co-activation in simultaneous interpreters.PloS one · 2023Article
- Brain bases of English morphological processing: A comparison between Chinese-English, Spanish-English bilingual, and English monolingual children.Developmental science · 2023Article
- Fingerspelling and Its Role in Translanguaging.Languages (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Cross-modal and cross-language activation in bilinguals reveals lexical competition even when words or signs are unheard or unseen.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022Article
- Visual word recognition in bilinguals: Eye-tracking evidence that L2 proficiency impacts access of L1 phonotactics.Studies in second language acquisition · 2022Article
- Spoken words activate native and non-native letter-to-sound mappings: Evidence from eye tracking.Brain and language · 2021Article
- Factors modulating cross-linguistic co-activation in bilinguals.Journal of phonetics · 2020Article
- Learning and processing of orthography-to-phonology mappings in a third language.International journal of multilingualism · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
When listening to spoken language, bilinguals access words in both of their languages at the same time; this co-activation is often driven by phonological input mapping to candidates in multiple languages during online comprehension. Here, we examined whether cross-linguistic activation could occur
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.