Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31367152›Full record

ReviewWorld journal of gastroenterology2019

Colorectal peritoneal metastases: Optimal management review.

Juan Manuel Sánchez-Hidalgo, Lidia Rodríguez-Ortiz, Álvaro Arjona-Sánchez, Sebastián Rufián-Peña, Ángela Casado-Adam, Antonio Cosano-Álvarez, Javier Briceño-Delgado

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in World journal of gastroenterology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 53 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
53citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
14.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

53 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 118 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Impact ofCancers · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Juan Manuel Sánchez-HidalgoDepartment of General and Digestive Surgery, Reina Sofia University Hospital, Cordoba 14004, Spain. juanmanuelsanchezhidalgo@hotmail.com.
Lidia Rodríguez-OrtizDepartment of General and Digestive Surgery, Reina Sofia University Hospital, Cordoba 14004, Spain.
Álvaro Arjona-SánchezDepartment of General and Digestive Surgery, Reina Sofia University Hospital, Cordoba 14004, Spain.
Sebastián Rufián-PeñaDepartment of General and Digestive Surgery, Reina Sofia University Hospital, Cordoba 14004, Spain.
Ángela Casado-AdamDepartment of General and Digestive Surgery, Reina Sofia University Hospital, Cordoba 14004, Spain.
Antonio Cosano-ÁlvarezDepartment of General and Digestive Surgery, Reina Sofia University Hospital, Cordoba 14004, Spain.
Javier Briceño-DelgadoDepartment of General and Digestive Surgery, Reina Sofia University Hospital, Cordoba 14004, Spain.
Hospital Universitario Reina Sofía · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The peritoneum is a common site of dissemination for colorrectal cancer, with a poorer prognosis than other sites of metastases. In the last two decades, it has been considered as a locoregional disease progression and treated as such with curative intention treatments. Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is the actual reference treatment for these patients as better survival results have been reached as compared to systemic chemotherapy alone, but its therapeutic efficacy is still under debate. Actual guidelines recommend that the management of colorectal cancer with peritoneal metastases should be led by a multidisciplinary team carried out in experienced centers and consider CRS + HIPEC for selected patients. Accumulative evidence in the last three years suggests that this is a curative treatment that may improve patients disease-free survival, decrease the risk of recurrence, and does not increase the risk of treatment-related mortality. In this review we aim to gather the latest results from referral centers and opinions from experts about the effectiveness and feasibility of CRS + HIPEC for treating peritoneal disease from colorectal malignancies.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsChemotherapy, AdjuvantChemotherapy, Cancer, Regional PerfusionClinical Trials as TopicColorectal NeoplasmsCytoreduction Surgical ProceduresDisease-Free SurvivalFeasibility StudiesHumansHyperthermia, InducedMeta-Analysis as TopicPatient Care TeamPeritoneal NeoplasmsPeritoneumPractice Guidelines as TopicPrognosisColorectal cancerCytoreductive surgeryHyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapyPeritoneal carcinomatosisPeritoneal metastases

Identifiers

PMID31367152
PMCPMC6658395
OpenAlexW2962306670

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.