ReviewWorld journal of gastroenterology2019
Stricter national standards are required for credentialing of endoscopic-retrograde-cholangiopancreatography in the United States.
Review in World journal of gastroenterology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparison of the Jcerity endoscoper airway and the endotracheal tube in endoscopic esophageal variceal ligation: a prospective randomized controlled trial.Scientific reports · 2023Trial
- Complications and expected imaging findings after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.World journal of radiology · 2025Review
- Article
- Determining the Median Effective Dose of Remimazolam for Anesthesia Induction in Patients Undergoing Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography: An Age-Stratified Study.Drug design, development and therapy · 2025Article
- Thermal changes in guidewires used during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography during electrical conductance: Ex-vivo safety experiment.Endoscopy international open · 2025Article
- Article
- Which Stones Are Best Left Unturned? Maybe the Small Ones.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2023Article
- Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography-related early perforations: A study of effects of procedure duration, complexity, and endoscopist experience.World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2023Article
- Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography-related complications: risk stratification, prevention, and management.Clinical endoscopy · 2023Review
- Article
- Malnutrition Is Associated With Worse Outcomes of Inpatient Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography.Cureus · 2022Article
- Increased ERCP volume improves cholangiogram interpretation: a new performance measure for ERCP training?Clinical endoscopy · 2022Article
- Endoscopic-mediated, biliary hydrodynamic injection mediating clinically relevant levels of gene delivery in pig liver.Gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2021Article
- Soft Liver Phantom with a Hollow Biliary System.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2021Article
- Gastroscope-Facilitated Endotracheal Intubation During ERCP: When Is the Best Time to GETA (Big) MAC?Digestive diseases and sciences · 2021Article
- The status of training in new technologies in advanced endoscopy: from defining competence to credentialing and privileging.Gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2020Review
- Pancreatic Duct Variations and the Risk of Post-Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography Pancreatitis.Cureus · 2020Review
- Two case reports of novel syndrome of bizarre performance of gastrointestinal endoscopy due to toxic encephalopathy of endoscopists among 181767 endoscopies in a 13-year-university hospital review: Endoscopists, first do no harm!World journal of gastroenterology · 2020Article
- Cytokine signatures in post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis: a pilot study.Annals of gastroenterologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Endoscopic-retrograde-cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is now a vital modality with primarily therapeutic and occasionally solely diagnostic utility for numerous biliary/pancreatic disorders. It has a significantly steeper learning curve than that for other standard gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopies, such as esophagogastroduodenoscopy or colonoscopy, due to greater technical difficulty and higher risk of complications. Yet, GI fellows have limited exposure to ERCP during standard-three-year-GI-fellowships because ERCP is much less frequently performed than esophagogastroduodenoscopy/colonoscopy. This led to adding an optional year of training in therapeutic endoscopy. Yet many graduates from standard three-year-fellowships without advanced training intensely pursue independent/unsupervised ERCP privileges despite inadequate numbers of performed ERCPs and unacceptably low rates of successful selective cannulation of desired (biliary or pancreatic) duct. Hospital credentialing committees have traditionally performed ERCP credentialing, but this practice has led to widespread flouting of recommended guidelines (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.