ArticleJournal of conservative dentistry : JCD
Comparative evaluation of effect of chlorhexidine,
Article in Journal of conservative dentistry : JCD. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparative evaluation of root canal disinfection efficacy of three different endodontic irrigants using EndoVac: AnJournal of conservative dentistry and endodontics · 2025Article
- Influence of different cavity disinfectants on composite adhesion to dentin of primary teeth: AnHeliyon · 2024Article
- Evaluation of the Effect of Applying Chitosan, Neem, Tulsi, Aloe vera, and Chlorhexidine Solutions on the Shear Bond Strength of Composite to Dentin.Journal of dentistry (Shiraz, Iran) · 2024Article
- Antimicrobial efficacy of 2% chlorhexidine gel, triphala, andJournal of conservative dentistry and endodontics · 2024Article
- The Comparison of Color Stability of Aloe Vera Gel and Chlorhexidine Solution on Acrylic Teeth.International journal of dentistry · 2022Article
- Evaluation ofJournal of conservative dentistry : JCDArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionCavity disinfectants help to remove the microbial remnants; hence, its use prior to any restoration is valuable, and a search for alternative to chlorhexidine (CHX) is required which may be more efficacious and can overcome the drawbacks of CHX.
objectiveThe aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of application of three different cavity disinfectants in a clinically relevant time period on the immediate and delayed shear bond strengths (SBSs) of an etch-and-rinse adhesive system to dentin. MATERIALS AND
methodsFor SBS testing, flat coronal dentin surfaces were prepared in two hundred extracted human molars. Specimens were randomly assigned to four groups according to the disinfectant used: Group I: Control (no disinfectant), Group II: 2% CHX solution, Group III:
resultsThe results showed that CHX,
conclusionFrom the results of the study, the authors concluded that
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.