Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31366926›Full record

ArticleNature communications2019

Fast and covariate-adaptive method amplifies detection power in large-scale multiple hypothesis testing.

Martin J Zhang, Fei Xia, James Zou

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. A selective inference approach for false discovery rate control using multiomics covariates yields insights into disease risk.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  19. Confidence maps: statistical inference of cryo-EM maps.Acta crystallographica. Section D, Structural biology · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Martin J ZhangDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Stanford University, Palo Alto, 94304, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0006-2466
Fei XiaDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Stanford University, Palo Alto, 94304, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4343-1444
James ZouDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Stanford University, Palo Alto, 94304, USA. jamesz@stanford.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8880-4764

Funding

Stanford Medicine Center for Longevity and Healthy Aging Research Education CoreP30AG059307 · NIA · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI ZOU, JAMES · 2018 to 2025
$4.9M
NIA NIH HHS P30 AG059307
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multiple hypothesis testing is an essential component of modern data science. In many settings, in addition to the p-value, additional covariates for each hypothesis are available, e.g., functional annotation of variants in genome-wide association studies. Such information is ignored by popular multiple testing approaches such as the Benjamini-Hochberg procedure (BH). Here we introduce AdaFDR, a fast and flexible method that adaptively learns the optimal p-value threshold from covariates to significantly improve detection power. On eQTL analysis of the GTEx data, AdaFDR discovers 32% more associations than BH at the same false discovery rate. We prove that AdaFDR controls false discovery proportion and show that it makes substantially more discoveries while controlling false discovery rate (FDR) in extensive experiments. AdaFDR is computationally efficient and allows multi-dimensional covariates with both numeric and categorical values, making it broadly useful across many applications.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsData Interpretation, StatisticalResearch DesignGenome-Wide Association StudyHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMicrobiotaPolymorphism, Single NucleotideProteomicsQuantitative Trait LociSequence Analysis, RNA

Identifiers

PMID31366926
PMCPMC6668431

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.