Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31366689›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical microbiology2019

Clinical Laboratory Tests Used To Aid in Diagnosis of Human Prion Disease.

Allyson Connor, Han Wang, Brian S Appleby, Daniel D Rhoads

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. What is the role of lipids in prion conversion and disease?Frontiers in molecular neuroscience · 2022
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Allyson ConnorDepartment of Neurology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center/Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
Han WangDepartment of Neurology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center/Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
Brian S ApplebyDepartment of Neurology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center/Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
Daniel D RhoadsNational Prion Disease Pathology Surveillance Center, Department of Pathology, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, USA ddr26@case.edu.
Case Western Reserve University · USUniversity Hospitals of Cleveland · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prion diseases are a group of rapidly progressive and always fatal neurodegenerative disorders caused by misfolded prion protein in the brain. Although autopsy remains the gold-standard diagnostic tool, antemortem laboratory testing can be performed to aid in the diagnosis of prion disease. This review is meant to help laboratory directors and physicians in their interpretation of test results. Laboratory assays to detect both nonspecific biomarkers of prion disease and prion-specific biomarkers can be used. The levels of nonspecific biomarkers in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) are elevated when rapid neurodegeneration is occurring in the patient, and these markers include 14-3-3, tau, neuron-specific enolase, S100B, and alpha-synuclein. These markers have various sensitivities and specificities but are overall limited, as the levels of any of these analytes can be elevated in nonprion disease that is causing rapid damage of brain tissue. Prion-specific assays used in clinical laboratory testing are currently limited to two options. The first option is second-generation real-time quaking-induced conversion (RT-QuIC) performed on CSF, and the second option is Western blotting of a brain biopsy specimen used to detect protease-resistant prion protein. Although both tests have exquisite specificity, RT-QuIC has a sensitivity of 92 to 97.2% in symptomatic individuals, compared to the brain biopsy Western blot sensitivity of 20 to 60%. RT-QuIC was added to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's diagnostic criteria for prion disease in 2018. Other caveats of laboratory testing need to be considered, as sporadic, genetic, and acquired forms of prion disease have different clinical and laboratory presentations, and these caveats are discussed. Laboratory testing plays an important role in the diagnosis of prion disease, which is often challenging to diagnose.

Indexed as

Diagnostic Tests, RoutineAutopsyBiomarkersClinical Laboratory TechniquesDiagnosis, DifferentialDisease SusceptibilityElectroencephalographyGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMolecular Diagnostic TechniquesPrion DiseasesSensitivity and SpecificityBiomarkers14-3-3CJDprionRT-QuICtau

Identifiers

PMID31366689
PMCPMC6760952
OpenAlexW2965859589

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.