ReviewJournal of clinical microbiology2019
Clinical Laboratory Tests Used To Aid in Diagnosis of Human Prion Disease.
Review in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prion disease mimicking rapidly progressive Alzheimer disease: case series and systematic review.Journal of neurology · 2026Pooled it
- Classification of sporadic Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease based on resting state scalp-recorded electroencephalogram-derived indices.PloS one · 2026Article
- Article
- Therapeutic strategies in prion disease: current evidence, translational challenges, and emerging directions.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2026Review
- Developing and translating a theory of informal caregiving in Sporadic Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease: a two-phase constructivist grounded theory study.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2026Article
- Article
- Pathways to healing: Plants with therapeutic potential for neurodegenerative diseases.IBRO neuroscience reports · 2023Article
- Therapeutic strategies for identifying small molecules against prion diseases.Cell and tissue research · 2023Review
- Role of Biomarkers for the Diagnosis of Prion Diseases: A Narrative Review.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2022Review
- Atypical Case of VV1 Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease Subtype: Case Report.Frontiers in neurology · 2022Article
- What is the role of lipids in prion conversion and disease?Frontiers in molecular neuroscience · 2022Review
- Sensitive protein misfolding cyclic amplification of sporadic Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease prions is strongly seed and substrate dependent.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Increasing the reproducibility of fluid biomarker studies in neurodegenerative studies.Nature communications · 2020Article
- Article
- Risk of Transmissibility From Neurodegenerative Disease-Associated Proteins: Experimental Knowns and Unknowns.Journal of neuropathology and experimental neurology · 2020Review
- Diverse proteins aggregate in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease brain.Alzheimer's research & therapy · 2020Article
- Detection of Pathognomonic Biomarker PrPBiomolecules · 2020Review
- Second-Generation RT-QuIC Assay for the Diagnosis of Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease Patients in Brazil.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Prion diseases are a group of rapidly progressive and always fatal neurodegenerative disorders caused by misfolded prion protein in the brain. Although autopsy remains the gold-standard diagnostic tool, antemortem laboratory testing can be performed to aid in the diagnosis of prion disease. This review is meant to help laboratory directors and physicians in their interpretation of test results. Laboratory assays to detect both nonspecific biomarkers of prion disease and prion-specific biomarkers can be used. The levels of nonspecific biomarkers in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) are elevated when rapid neurodegeneration is occurring in the patient, and these markers include 14-3-3, tau, neuron-specific enolase, S100B, and alpha-synuclein. These markers have various sensitivities and specificities but are overall limited, as the levels of any of these analytes can be elevated in nonprion disease that is causing rapid damage of brain tissue. Prion-specific assays used in clinical laboratory testing are currently limited to two options. The first option is second-generation real-time quaking-induced conversion (RT-QuIC) performed on CSF, and the second option is Western blotting of a brain biopsy specimen used to detect protease-resistant prion protein. Although both tests have exquisite specificity, RT-QuIC has a sensitivity of 92 to 97.2% in symptomatic individuals, compared to the brain biopsy Western blot sensitivity of 20 to 60%. RT-QuIC was added to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's diagnostic criteria for prion disease in 2018. Other caveats of laboratory testing need to be considered, as sporadic, genetic, and acquired forms of prion disease have different clinical and laboratory presentations, and these caveats are discussed. Laboratory testing plays an important role in the diagnosis of prion disease, which is often challenging to diagnose.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.