Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31366657›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2019

Accuracy of patient perceptions of maternity facility quality and the choice of providers in Nairobi, Kenya: a cohort study.

Zeina Ali Siam, Margaret McConnell, Ginger Golub, George Nyakora, Claire Rothschild, Jessica Cohen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Zeina Ali SiamGraduate School of Arts and Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA siamz@g.harvard.edu.
Margaret McConnellDepartment of Global Health and Population, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Ginger GolubInnovations for Poverty Action, Nairobi, Kenya.
George NyakoraCenter for Health Solutions Kenya, Nairobi, Kenya.
Claire RothschildDepartment Epidemiology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Jessica CohenDepartment of Global Health and Population, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Harvard University · USCentre for Health Solutions · KEHarvard Global Health Institute · USPractical Action · KEUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis study aimed to assess the accuracy of pregnant women's perceptions of maternity facility quality and the association between perception accuracy and the quality of facility chosen for delivery.

designA cohort study.

settingNairobi, Kenya.

participants180 women, surveyed during pregnancy and 2 to 4 weeks after delivery. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Women were surveyed during pregnancy regarding their perceptions of the quality of all facilities they were considering during delivery and then, after delivery, about their ultimate facility choice. Perceptions of quality were based on perceived ability to handle emergencies and complications. Delivery facilities were assigned a quality index score based on a direct assessment of performance of emergency 'signal functions', skilled provider availability, medical equipment and drug stocks. 'Accurate perceptions' was a binary variable equal to one if a woman's ranking of facilities based on her quality perception equalled the index ranking. Ordinary least squares and logistic regressions were used to analyse associations between accurate perceptions and quality of the facility chosen for delivery.

resultsAssessed technical quality was modest, with an average index score of 0.65. 44% of women had accurate perceptions of quality ranking. Accurate perceptions were associated with a 0.069 higher delivery facility quality score (p=0.039; 95% CI: 0.004 to 0.135) and with a 14.5% point higher probability of delivering in a facility in the top quartile of the quality index (p=0.015; 95% CI: 0.029 to 0.260).

conclusionsPatient misperceptions of technical quality were associated with use of lower quality facilities. Larger studies could determine whether improving patient information about relative facility quality can encourage use of higher quality care.

Indexed as

PerceptionAdultCohort StudiesEmergenciesEquipment and Supplies, HospitalFemaleHospitals, MaternityHumansKenyaPersonnel, HospitalPostpartum PeriodPregnancyPregnant PeopleSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung Adulthealth economicshealth & safetyquality in health care

Identifiers

PMID31366657
PMCPMC6677992
OpenAlexW2965310796

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.