Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31366325›Full record

Trial reportBMC anesthesiology2019

Postoperative sore throat and subglottic injury after McGrath® MAC videolaryngoscopic intubation with versus without a stylet in patients with a high Mallampati score: a randomized controlled trial.

Hyun-Kyu Yoon, Hyung-Chul Lee, Hyongmin Oh, Kwanghoon Jun, Hee-Pyoung Park

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC anesthesiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Evaluation of transmitted glow point atThe Journal of international medical research · 2020
    Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hyun-Kyu YoonDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 03080, South Korea.
Hyung-Chul LeeDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 03080, South Korea.
Hyongmin OhDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 03080, South Korea.
Kwanghoon JunDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 03080, South Korea.
Hee-Pyoung ParkDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 03080, South Korea. hppark@snu.ac.kr.ORCID 0000-0002-4772-0780
Seoul National University Hospital · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA tracheal tube stylet can be used to assist successful tracheal intubation, especially during videolaryngoscopic intubation because videolaryngoscopes with a Macintosh-type blade such as McGrath® MAC videolaryngoscope have more acute angle than conventional Macintosh laryngoscope. However, the use of a stylet during tracheal intubation can raise concerns about stylet-induced postoperative airway complications, such as sore throat, subglottic injury, and hoarseness. In this study, we compared the incidence of postoperative airway complications after McGrath® MAC videolaryngoscopic intubation with versus without a stylet in patients with a high Mallampati score.

methodsIn 104 patients with Mallampati score III or IV and who were scheduled for lumbar or thoracic spine surgery, McGrath® MAC videolaryngoscopic intubation was performed either with a stylet (group S, n = 52) or without a stylet (group N, n = 52). The primary outcome measure was the incidences of sore throat evaluated at 1 and 24 h postoperatively. Secondary outcome measures were the incidences of subglottic injury and postoperative hoarseness.

resultsThe incidence of CL grade III in group S and N was 3.8 and 5.8%, respectively. No patient showed CL grade IV. The incidences of sore throat at 1 (26.9 vs 19.2%, P = 0.485) and 24 h (17.3 vs 13.5%, P = 0.786, respectively) postoperatively were not significantly different between the group S and N. However, the incidence of subglottic injury was significantly higher in the group S, compared with the group N (65.4 vs 42.3%, P = 0.030). The incidence of postoperative hoarseness did not differ significantly between the two groups.

conclusionsThe use of a stylet during McGrath® MAC videolaryngoscopic intubation did not have a significant impact on the incidence of postoperative sore throat in patients with a high Mallampati score. Avoiding the use of a stylet during intubation with McGrath® MAC videolaryngoscope may reduce the incidence of subglottic injury in such patients.

trial registrationClinical Research Information Service (identifier: KCT0002427 , date of registration: June 12, 2017).

Indexed as

LaryngoscopesLaryngoscopyVideo RecordingFemaleGlottisHoarsenessHumansIntubation, IntratrachealMaleMiddle AgedPharyngitisPostoperative ComplicationsMcGrath® MAC videolaryngoscopic intubationPostoperative sore throatStyletSubglottic injury

Identifiers

PMID31366325
PMCPMC6668117
OpenAlexW2966525630

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.