Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31366289›Full record

ReviewSocial studies of science2019

Epigenetics, ethics, law and society: A multidisciplinary review of descriptive, instrumental, dialectical and reflexive analyses.

Charles Dupras, Katie Michelle Saulnier, Yann Joly

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Social studies of science, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. A content analysis of health-related epigenetic information in YouTube videos.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2026
    Article
  5. Epigenetics, Resilience, Protective Factors and Factors Promoting Positive Outcomes: A Scoping Review.International journal of developmental neuroscience : the official journal of the International Society for Developmental Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Revisiting Epigenetics Fundamentals and Its Biomedical Implications.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. The Epigenetics of Migraine.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Walk on the wild side: a response to Zaina.Epigenetics communications · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Charles DuprasCentre of Genomics and Policy, McGill University and Génome Québec Innovation Centre, Canada.
Katie Michelle SaulnierCentre of Genomics and Policy, McGill University and Génome Québec Innovation Centre, Canada.
Yann JolyCentre of Genomics and Policy, McGill University and Génome Québec Innovation Centre, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Epigenetics, defined as 'the study of mitotically and/or meiotically heritable changes in gene function that cannot be explained by changes in DNA sequence', has emerged as a promissory yet controversial field of scientific inquiry over the past decade. Scholars from many disciplines have formulated both optimistic and cautionary claims regarding its potential normative implications. This article provides a comprehensive review of the nascent literature at the crossroads of epigenetics, ethics, law and society. It describes nine emerging areas of discussion, relating to (1) the impact of epigenetics on the nature versus nurture dualism, (2) the potential resulting biologization of the social, (3) the meaning of epigenetics for public health, its potential influence on (4) reproduction and parenting, (5) political theory and (6) legal proceedings, and concerns regarding (7) stigmatization and discrimination, (8) privacy protection and (9) knowledge translation. While there is some degree of similarity between the nature and content of these areas and the abundant literature on ethical, legal and social issues in genetics, the potential implications of epigenetics ought not be conflated with the latter. Critical studies on epigenetics are emerging within a separate space of bioethical and biopolitical investigations and claims, with scholars from various epistemological standpoints utilizing distinct yet complementary analytical approaches.

Indexed as

EpigenomicsPublic HealthSocial ResponsibilityHumansbiologizationdiscriminationELSIepigeneticsknowledge translationnature versus nurtureprivacyreproductionresponsibility and justice

Identifiers

PMID31366289
PMCPMC6801799

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.