Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31366280›Full record

ReviewCancer biology & therapy2019

Current state of melanoma diagnosis and treatment.

Lauren E Davis, Sara C Shalin, Alan J Tackett

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancer biology & therapy, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 483 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
483citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

483 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review

423 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Lauren E DavisUniversity of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology , Little Rock , AR , USA.
Sara C ShalinUniversity of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Department of Pathology , Little Rock , AR , USA.
Alan J TackettUniversity of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology , Little Rock , AR , USA.

Funding

Translational Regulation in Normal Erythropoiesis and Diamond Blackfan AnemiaP20GM121293 · NIGMS · ARKANSAS CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL RES INST · PI Samrat Roy Choudhury · 2017 to 2026
$27.6M
NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM121293
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Melanoma is the deadliest form of skin cancer. In the early stages, melanoma can be treated successfully with surgery alone and survival rates are high, but after metastasis survival rates drop significantly. Therefore, early and correct diagnosis is key for ensuring patients have the best possible prognosis. Melanoma misdiagnosis accounts for more pathology and dermatology malpractice claims than any cancer other than breast cancer, as an early misdiagnosis can significantly reduce a patient's chances of survival. As far as treatment for metastatic melanoma goes, there have been several new drugs developed over the last 10 years that have greatly improved the prognosis of patients with metastatic melanoma, however, a majority of patients do not show a lasting response to these treatments. Thus, new biomarkers and drug targets are needed to improve the accuracy of melanoma diagnosis and treatment. This article will discuss the major advancements of melanoma diagnosis and treatment from antiquity to the present day.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorDiagnostic ErrorsHumansImmunotherapyMalpracticeMelanomaPrognosisBiomarkers, TumordiagnosisepigeneticsimmunohistochemistryimmunotherapyMelanomatreatment

Identifiers

PMID31366280
PMCPMC6804807

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.