Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31366043›Full record

ReviewCancers2019

Uveal Melanoma Biopsy: A Review.

Luisa Frizziero, Edoardo Midena, Sara Trainiti, Davide Londei, Laura Bonaldi, Silvia Bini, Raffaele Parrozzani

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancers, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 64 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Investigating Microinvasive Intra-Ocular Biopsy.Clinical & experimental ophthalmology · 2025
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Advances in Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography for Diagnosing and Managing Primary Posterior Uveal Melanoma.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2025
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Pathological and Molecular Diagnosis of Uveal Melanoma.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Evaluation of Circulating Tumor DNA as a Liquid Biomarker in Uveal Melanoma.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2024
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Luisa FrizzieroIRCCS-Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico-Fondazione Bietti, 00198 Rome, Italy.
Edoardo MidenaIRCCS-Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico-Fondazione Bietti, 00198 Rome, Italy. edoardo.midena@unipd.it.
Sara TrainitiDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Padova, 35128 Padova, Italy.
Davide LondeiDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Padova, 35128 Padova, Italy.
Laura BonaldiImmunology and Molecular Oncology Unit, Veneto Institute of Oncology, IOV-IRCCS - Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, 35128 Padova, Italy.
Silvia BiniIRCCS-Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico-Fondazione Bietti, 00198 Rome, Italy.
Raffaele ParrozzaniDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Padova, 35128 Padova, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-0216-727X
University of Padua · ITFondazione G.B. Bietti · ITIstituto Oncologico Veneto · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intraocular tumor diagnosis is based on clinical findings supported by additional imaging tools, such as ultrasound, optical coherence tomography and angiographic techniques, usually without the need for invasive procedures or tissue sampling. Despite improvements in the local treatment of uveal melanoma (UM), the prevention and treatment of the metastatic disease remain unsolved, and nearly 50% of patients develop liver metastasis. The current model suggests that tumor cells have already spread by the time of diagnosis, remaining dormant until there are favorable conditions. Tumor sampling procedures at the time of primary tumor diagnosis/treatment are therefore now commonly performed, usually not to confirm the diagnosis of UM, but to obtain a tissue sample for prognostication, to assess patient's specific metastatic risk. Moreover, several studies are ongoing to identify genes specific to UM tumorigenesis, leading to several potential targeted therapeutic strategies. Genetic information can also influence the surveillance timing and metastatic screening type of patients affected by UM. In spite of the widespread use of biopsies in general surgical practice, in ophthalmic oncology the indications and contraindications for tumor biopsy continue to be under debate. The purpose of this review paper is to critically evaluate the role of uveal melanoma biopsy in ophthalmic oncology.

Indexed as

biopsyfine needle aspiration biopsymetastasesprognosisuveal melanoma

Identifiers

PMID31366043
PMCPMC6721328
OpenAlexW2965181650

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.