Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31365941›Full record

ArticleApplied clinical informatics2019

Design and Implementation of a Comprehensive Surveillance System for Venous Thromboembolism in a Defined Region Using Electronic and Manual Approaches.

Thomas L Ortel, Katie Arnold, Michele Beckman, Audrey Brown, Nimia Reyes, Ibrahim Saber, Ryan Schulteis, Bhavana Pendurthi Singh, Andrea Sitlinger, Elizabeth H Thames

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applied clinical informatics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Thomas L OrtelDivision of Hematology, Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, United States.
Katie ArnoldDuke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, United States.
Michele BeckmanCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, United States.
Audrey BrownSocial & Scientific Systems, Inc., Durham, North Carolina, United States.
Nimia ReyesCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, United States.
Ibrahim SaberDivision of Hematology, Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, United States.
Ryan SchulteisDurham Veterans' Administration Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, United States.
Bhavana Pendurthi SinghMedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, District of Columbia, United States.
Andrea SitlingerHematologic Malignancies and Cellular Therapy, Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, United States.
Elizabeth H ThamesDivision of Hematology, Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, United States.

Funding

POPULATION-BASED SURVEILLANCE AND OUTCOMES OF VENOUS THROMBOEMBOLISMU50DD000897 · DD · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI ORTEL, THOMAS L · 2012 to 2014
$750k
NCBDD CDC HHS U50 DD000897
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSystematic surveillance for venous thromboembolism (VTE) in the United States has been recommended by several organizations. Despite adoption of electronic medical records (EMRs) by most health care providers and facilities, however, systematic surveillance for VTE is not available.

objectivesThis article develops a comprehensive, population-based surveillance strategy for VTE in a defined geographical region.

methodsThe primary surveillance strategy combined computerized searches of the EMR with a manual review of imaging data at the Duke University Health System in Durham County, North Carolina, United States. Different strategies of searching the EMR were explored. Consolidation of results with autopsy reports (nonsearchable in the EMR) and with results from the Durham Veterans' Administration Medical Center was performed to provide a comprehensive report of new VTE from the defined region over a 2-year timeframe.

resultsMonthly searches of the primary EMR missed a significant number of patients with new VTE who were identified by a separate manual search of radiology records, apparently related to delays in data entry and coding into the EMR. Comprehensive searches incorporating a location-restricted strategy were incomplete due to the assigned residence reflecting the current address and not the address at the time of event. The most comprehensive strategy omitted the geographic restriction step and identified all patients with VTE followed by manual review of individual records to remove incorrect entries (e.g., outside the surveillance time period or geographic location; no evidence for VTE). Consolidation of results from the EMR searches with results from autopsy reports and the separate facility identified additional patients not diagnosed within the Duke system.

conclusionWe identified several challenges with implementing a comprehensive VTE surveillance program that could limit accuracy of the results. Improved electronic strategies are needed to cross-reference patients across multiple health systems and to minimize the need for manual review and confirmation of results.

Indexed as

Electronic Health RecordsAutopsyData MiningGeographyHospitalsHumansPopulation SurveillanceVenous Thromboembolism

Identifiers

PMID31365941
PMCPMC6669040

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.