Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31365683›Full record

ArticleJornal brasileiro de pneumologia : publicacao oficial da Sociedade Brasileira de Pneumologia e Tisilogia2019

Evaluating the extremely elderly at a pulmonary function clinic for the diagnosis of respiratory disease: frequency and technical quality of spirometry.

Saulo Maia d'Avila Melo, Larissa Alves de Oliveira, José Lucas Farias Wanderley, Rodrigo Dos Anjos Rocha

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Jornal brasileiro de pneumologia : publicacao oficial da Sociedade Brasileira de Pneumologia e Tisilogia, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Lung Cancer: New Directions in Senior Patients Assessment.Geriatrics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Observational
  8. [Lung function test in advanced age].Zeitschrift fur Gerontologie und Geriatrie · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Saulo Maia d'Avila Melo. Ambulatório de Pneumologia, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade Tiradentes, Aracaju (SE) Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7811-4305
Larissa Alves de Oliveira. Residência em Clínica Médica, Universidade Federal de Sergipe, Aracaju (SE) Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2706-4018
José Lucas Farias Wanderley. Residência em Anestesiologia. Hospital Universitário Professor Alberto Antunes, Universidade Federal de Alagoas, Maceió (AL) Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2667-9480
Rodrigo Dos Anjos Rocha. Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade Tiradentes, Aracaju (SE) Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8989-3444
Universidade Tiradentes · BRUniversidade Federal de Alagoas · BRUniversidade Federal de Sergipe · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo determine the frequency of spirometry in elderly people, by age group, at a pulmonary function clinic, to assess the quality of spirometry in the extremely elderly, and to determine whether chronological age influences the quality of spirometry.

methodsThis was a cross-sectional retrospective study evaluating information (spirometry findings and respiratory questionnaire results) obtained from the database of a pulmonary function clinic in the city of Aracaju, Brazil, for the period from January of 2012 to April of 2017. In the sample as a whole, we determined the total number of spirometry tests performed, and the frequency of the tests in individuals ≥ 60 years of age, ≥ 65 years of age, and by decade of age, from age 60 onward. In the extremely elderly, we evaluated the quality of spirometry using criteria of acceptability and reproducibility, as well as examining the variables that can influence that quality, such a cognitive deficit.

resultsThe sample comprised a total of 4,126 spirometry tests. Of those, 961 (23.30%), 864 (20.94%), 102 (2.47%), and 26 (0.63%) were performed in individuals ≥ 60, ≥ 65, ≥ 86, and ≥ 90 years of age (defined as extreme old age), respectively. In the extremely elderly, the criteria for acceptability and reproducibility were met in 88% and 60% of the spirometry tests (95% CI: 75.26-100.00 and 40.80-79.20), respectively. The cognitive deficit had a negative effect on acceptability and reproducibility (p ≤ 0.015 and p ≤ 0.007, respectively).

conclusionsA significant number of elderly individuals undergo spirometry, especially at ≥ 85 years of age, and the majority of such individuals are able to perform the test in a satisfactory manner, despite their advanced age. However, a cognitive deficit could have a negative effect on the quality of spirometry.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsAgingCognitive DysfunctionComorbidityCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleForced Expiratory VolumeHumansLungMaleMiddle AgedPeak Expiratory Flow RateReproducibility of ResultsRespiratory Tract Diseases

Identifiers

PMID31365683
PMCPMC6733717
OpenAlexW2965031827

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.