Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31365624›Full record

Trial reportArchives of endocrinology and metabolism2019

Postprandial metabolic effects of fructose and glucose in type 1 diabetes patients: a pilot randomized crossover clinical trial.

Débora Lopes Souto, Érika Dos Santos Lima, Joana Rodrigues Dantas, Lenita Zajdenverg, Melanie Rodacki, Eliane Lopes Rosado

Registry-linked trialOpen access · diamondAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Archives of endocrinology and metabolism, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01713023 (Effect of Fructose and Glucose and TAS1R2 in Glucose, Triglycerides, Uremia, Oxidative Stress, Feelings Related to Food Intake of Individuals With Type 1 Diabetes), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01713023 nacompletednot on this map

Effect of Fructose and Glucose and TAS1R2 in Glucose, Triglycerides, Uremia, Oxidative Stress, Feelings Related to Food Intake of Individuals With Type 1 Diabetes

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversidade Federal do Rio de JaneiroRan2013 to 2016Enrolled16ConditionsType 1 DiabetesArmsGlucose, Fructose
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Débora Lopes SoutoUniversidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ), Instituto de Nutrição Josué de Castro, Departamento de Nutrição e Dietética, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5149-0391
Érika Dos Santos LimaUniversidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ), Instituto de Nutrição Josué de Castro, Departamento de Nutrição e Dietética, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.
Joana Rodrigues DantasUniversidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ), Departamento de Medicina Interna, Seção de Diabetes e Nutrologia, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.
Lenita ZajdenvergUniversidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ), Departamento de Medicina Interna, Seção de Diabetes e Nutrologia, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1579-3299
Melanie RodackiUniversidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ), Departamento de Medicina Interna, Seção de Diabetes e Nutrologia, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.
Eliane Lopes RosadoUniversidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ), Instituto de Nutrição Josué de Castro, Departamento de Nutrição e Dietética, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0889-4662
Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo test the influence of oral fructose and glucose dose-response solutions in blood glucose (BG), glucagon, triglycerides, uricaemia, and malondialdehyde in postprandial states in type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) patients. SUBJECTS AND

methodsThe study had a simple-blind, randomized, two-way crossover design in which T1DM patients were selected to receive fructose and glucose solutions (75g of sugars dissolved in 200 mL of mineral-water) in two separate study days, with 2-7 weeks washout period. In each day, blood samples were drawn after 8h fasting and at 180 min postprandial to obtain glucose, glucagon, triglycerides, uric acid, lactate, and malondialdehyde levels.

resultsSixteen T1DM patients (seven men) were evaluated, with a mean age of 25.19 ± 8.8 years, a mean duration of disease of 14.88 ± 4.73 years, and glycated hemoglobin of 8.13 ± 1.84%. Fructose resulted in lower postprandial BG levels than glucose (4.4 ± 5.5 mmol/L; and 12.9 ± 4.1 mmol/L, respectively; p < 0.01). Uric acid levels increased after fructose (26.1 ± 49.9 µmol/L; p < 0.01) and reduced after glucose (-13.6 ± 9.5 µmol/L; p < 0.01). The malondialdehyde increased after fructose (1.4 ± 1.6 µmol/L; p < 0.01) and did not change after glucose solution (-0.2 ± 1.6 µmol/L; p = 0.40). Other variables did not change.

conclusionsFructose and glucose had similar sweetness, flavor and aftertaste characteristics and did not change triglycerides, lactate or glucagon levels. Although fructose resulted in lower postprandial BG than glucose, it increased uric acid and malondialdehyde levels in T1DM patients. Therefore it should be used with caution. ClinicalTrials.gov registration: NCT01713023.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultBlood GlucoseCross-Over StudiesDiabetes Mellitus, Type 1Dose-Response Relationship, DrugDrug ToleranceFemaleFructoseGlucoseHumansMaleMalondialdehydeMiddle AgedPilot ProjectsPostprandial PeriodBlood GlucoseFructoseGlucoseMalondialdehydeSolutionsSweetening AgentsTriglyceridesUric Acid

Identifiers

PMID31365624
PMCPMC10528643
OpenAlexW2963471374

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.