Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31365573›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

Local DRLs and automated risk estimation in paediatric interventional cardiology.

Dimitri Buytaert, Kristof Vandekerckhove, Joseph Panzer, Lukas Rubbens, Daniël De Wolf, Klaus Bacher

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Patient and physician exposure to X-rays at pediatric interventional cardiology - from world to Poland.International journal of occupational medicine and environmental health · 2024
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Radiation Exposure in Pediatric Interventional Procedures.Cardiovascular and interventional radiology · 2021
    Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Dimitri BuytaertDepartment of Human Structure and Repair, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0003-0592-5873
Kristof VandekerckhoveDepartment of Paediatric Cardiology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
Joseph PanzerDepartment of Paediatric Cardiology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
Lukas RubbensDepartment of Paediatric Cardiology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
Daniël De WolfDepartment of Paediatric Cardiology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
Klaus BacherDepartment of Human Structure and Repair, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionCardiac catheterization procedures result in high radiation doses and often multiple procedures are necessary for congenital heart disease patients. However, diagnostic reference levels (DRL) remain scarce. Our first goal was finding the optimal DRL parameter and determining appropriate DRLs. The second goal was to calculate organ doses (OD), effective doses (ED) and lifetime attributable risks (LAR) per procedure and to provide conversion factors based on dose area product (DAP). MATERIALS AND

methodsDRLs are calculated for each procedure type, as the 75th percentile of the cumulative value per procedure from the corresponding parameter. All irradiation events in the DICOM Structured Reports were automatically processed and simulated using PCXMC, resulting in OD, ED and LAR. Using a Kruskal Wallis H test and subsequent pairwise comparisons, differences in median values of the DRL parameter between procedure types were assessed.

resultsLinear regression showed a strong correlation and narrow confidence interval between DAP and product of body weight and fluoroscopy time (BWxFT), even when all procedures (diagnostic and interventional) are combined. Only 15% of the pairwise comparisons were statistically significant for DAP normalized to BWxFT (DAPBWxFT). The latter pairs contained less frequent procedure types with significant outliers. For DAP normalized to BW (DAPBW), 38% of the pairwise comparisons showed statistically significant differences. Conversion factors from DAPBW to OD and ED were reported for various weight groups, due to the higher correlation between DAPBW and both OD and ED than between DAP and both OD and ED.

conclusionsThe P75 of DAPBWxFT for all procedures combined serves as an appropriate DRL value. This facilitates local DRL determination in smaller paediatric centres, which often have insufficient data to produce appropriate DRLs for different procedure types. Conversion factors are more reliable starting from DAPBW instead of DAP and should be used according to the appropriate BW group.

Indexed as

Body WeightCardiac CatheterizationChildFemaleFluoroscopyHeart Defects, CongenitalHumansLinear ModelsMaleRadiation DosageRadiography, InterventionalReference ValuesRisk Assessment

Identifiers

PMID31365573
PMCPMC6668795

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.