Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31365560›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

Amplicon-based microbiome study highlights the loss of diversity and the establishment of a set of species in patients with dentin caries.

Diana Wolff, Cornelia Frese, Kyrill Schoilew, Alexander Dalpke, Bjoern Wolff, Sébastien Boutin

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 61 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Meta-Analysis Using NGS Data: TheFrontiers in oral health · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Where bacteria and eukaryotes meet.Journal of bacteriology · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Diana WolffDepartment of Conservative Dentistry, Centre of Dentistry, Oral Medicine and Maxillofacial Surgery, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3353-9355
Cornelia FreseDepartment of Conservative Dentistry, School of Dental Medicine, Ruprecht-Karls-University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Kyrill SchoilewDepartment of Conservative Dentistry, School of Dental Medicine, Ruprecht-Karls-University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Alexander DalpkeMedical Microbiology and Hygiene, Technical University Dresden, Dresden, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1648-6618
Bjoern WolffDepartment of Conservative Dentistry, School of Dental Medicine, Ruprecht-Karls-University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Sébastien BoutinDepartment of Infectious Diseases-Medical Microbiology and Hygiene, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Heidelberg University · DEUniversity of Tübingen · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo elicit patterns in pathogenic biofilm composition we characterized the oral microbiome present in patients with dentin caries in comparison to healthy subjects.

methods16S amplicon sequencing was used to analyse a total of 56 patients; 19 samples of carious dentin (pooled from at least three teeth) and 37 supragingival samples (pooled from three healthy tooth surfaces). Oral and periodontal status and socio-demographic parameters were recorded. Group assignment, smoking and further socio-demographic parameters were used as explanatory variables in the microbiome composition analysis.

resultsOverall, a total of 4,110,020 DNA high-quality sequences were yielded. Using a threshold of similarity >97% for assigning operational taxonomic units (OTU), a total of 1,537 OTUs were identified. PERMANOVA showed significant differences in microbiome composition between the groups caries/healthy (p = 0.001), smoking/non-smoking (p = 0.007) and fluoride intake during childhood yes/no (tablets p = 0.003, salt p = 0.023). The healthy microbiome had a significantly higher diversity (alpha diversity, p<0.001) and a lower dominance (Berger-Parker index, p<0.001). It was dominated by Fusobacteria. A linear discriminant analysis effect size (LEfSe) yielded a set of 39 OTUs being more abundant in carious dentin samples, including Atopobium spp. (14.9 log2FoldChange), Lactobacillus casei (11.6), Acinetobacter spp. (10.8), Lactobacillus gasseri (10.6), Parascardovia denticolens (10.5), Olsenella profusa (10.4), and others. Also Propionibacterium acidifaciens (7.2) and Streptococcus mutans (5.2) were overabundant in caries lesions.

conclusionsThe healthy microbiome was highly diverse. The advanced caries microbiome was dominated by a set of carious associated bacteria where S. mutans played only a minor role. Smoking and fluoride intake during childhood influenced the microbiome composition significantly. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: The presented investigation adds knowledge to the still not fully comprehended patterns of oral microbiomes in caries compared with oral health. By analysing the genetics of biofilm samples from oral health and severe tooth decay we found distinct discriminating species which could be targets for future therapeutic approaches.

Indexed as

AdultAgedBiofilmsCase-Control StudiesDental CariesDentinDNA, BacterialFemaleGenetic VariationHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansMaleMicrobiotaMiddle AgedYoung AdultDNA, Bacterial

Identifiers

PMID31365560
PMCPMC6668773
OpenAlexW2966517170

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.