Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31365553›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

Comparison of implantation sites for the development of peritoneal metastasis in a colorectal cancer mouse model using non-invasive bioluminescence imaging.

Abdelkader Taibi, Jeremie Albouys, Jeremie Jacques, Marie-Laure Perrin, Catherine Yardin, Sylvaine Durand Fontanier, Sylvia M Bardet

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. [Efficacy of CD4/TGF-β bispecific antibody in a mouse model of peritoneal metastasis of malignant melanoma].Nan fang yi ke da xue xue bao = Journal of Southern Medical University · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. CD244Oncology reports · 2021
    Article
  9. 10 ns PEFs induce a histological response linked to cell death and cytotoxic T-lymphocytes in an immunocompetent mouse model of peritoneal metastasis.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Abdelkader TaibiVisceral Surgery Department, Dupuytren University Hospital, Limoges, France.ORCID 0000-0002-1036-6474
Jeremie AlbouysUniversity Limoges, CNRS, XLIM, UMR 7252, Limoges, France.
Jeremie JacquesUniversity Limoges, CNRS, XLIM, UMR 7252, Limoges, France.
Marie-Laure PerrinUniversity Limoges, CNRS, XLIM, UMR 7252, Limoges, France.
Catherine YardinUniversity Limoges, CNRS, XLIM, UMR 7252, Limoges, France.
Sylvaine Durand FontanierVisceral Surgery Department, Dupuytren University Hospital, Limoges, France.
Sylvia M BardetUniversity Limoges, CNRS, XLIM, UMR 7252, Limoges, France.ORCID 0000-0002-0217-6910
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The development of cancer mouse models is still needed for the identification and preclinical validation of novel therapeutic targets in colorectal cancer, which is the third leading cause of cancer-related deaths in Europe. The purpose of this study was to determine the most accurate tumour cell injection method to obtain suitable peritoneal metastasis (PM) for subsequent therapeutic treatments. Here, we grafted murine colon carcinoma CT-26 cells expressing luciferase into immunocompetent BALB-c mice by intravenous injection (IV group), subcutaneous injection (SC group), intraperitoneal injection after peritoneal scratching (A group) or intraperitoneal injection alone (IP group). Tumour growth was monitored by bioluminescence during the first 15 days post-grafting. The peritoneal carcinomatosis index was evaluated macroscopically, histology, immunohistochemistry and multiphoton microscopy were performed in peritoneal tumour tissue. Upon implantation, no tumour growth was observed in the IV group, similar to the non-injected group. Both the IP and SC groups showed intermediate growth rates, but the SC group produced only a single subcutaneous nodule. The A group exhibited the highest tumour growth at 15 days post-surgery. Anatomic and histologic analyses corroborated the existence of various tumour nodules, and multiphoton microscopy was used to evaluate tumour fibrosis-infiltrating cells in a non-pathologic peritoneum. In conclusion, limited PM was obtained by IP injection, whereas IP injection after peritoneal scratching led to an extensive PM murine model for evaluating new therapeutics.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell Line, TumorColorectal NeoplasmsDisease Models, AnimalInjections, IntraperitonealInjections, IntravenousInjections, SubcutaneousLuminescent MeasurementsMiceMice, Inbred BALB CMicroscopy, Fluorescence, MultiphotonNeoplasm TransplantationPeritoneal NeoplasmsPeritoneum

Identifiers

PMID31365553
PMCPMC6668798
OpenAlexW2964768994

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.