Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31365181›Full record

ArticleHuman brain mapping2019

Cerebellar contribution to auditory feedback control of speech production: Evidence from patients with spinocerebellar ataxia.

Weifeng Li, Jiajun Zhuang, Zhiqiang Guo, Jeffery A Jones, Zhiqin Xu, Hanjun Liu

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human brain mapping, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Neurophysiology of cerebellar ataxias and gait disorders.Clinical neurophysiology practice · 2023
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Weifeng LiDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Guangdong ProvincialPeople's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Jiajun ZhuangDepartment of Neurology, Weifang People's Hospital, Weifang, Shandong.
Zhiqiang GuoDepartment of Computer Science and Technology, Zhuhai College of Jilin University, Zhuhai, China.
Jeffery A JonesPsychology Department and Laurier Centre for Cognitive Neuroscience, Wilfrid Laurier University, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.
Zhiqin XuDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Hanjun LiuDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.ORCID 0000-0003-1466-4193
Sun Yat-sen University · CNJilin University · CNWeifang People's Hospital · CNWilfrid Laurier University · CA

Funding

Guangdong Medical Science and Technology Research Funds A2017044Guangdong Province Science and Technology Planning Project 2017A050501014Guangzhou Science and Technology Programme 201604020115National Natural Science Foundation of China 31371135National Natural Science Foundation of China 81472154National Natural Science Foundation of China 81772439Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province 2018A030310037
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The cerebellum has been implicated in the feedforward control of speech production. However, the role of the cerebellum in the feedback control of speech production remains unclear. To address this question, the present event-related potential study examined the behavioral and neural correlates of auditory feedback control of vocal production in patients with spinocerebellar ataxia (SCA) and healthy controls. All participants were instructed to produce sustained vowels while hearing their voice unexpectedly pitch-shifted -200 or -500 cents. The behavioral results revealed significantly larger vocal compensations for pitch perturbations in patients with SCA relative to healthy controls. At the cortical level, patients with SCA exhibited significantly smaller cortical P2 responses that were source localized in the right superior temporal gyrus, primary auditory cortex, and supramarginal gyrus than healthy controls. These findings indicate that reduced brain activity in the right temporal and parietal regions are significant neural contributors to abnormal auditory-motor processing of vocal pitch regulation as a consequence of cerebellar degeneration, which may be related to disrupted reciprocal interactions between the cerebellum and cortical regions that support the top-down modulation of auditory-vocal integration. These differences in behavior and cortical activity between healthy controls and patients with SCA demonstrate that the cerebellum is not only essential for feedforward control but also plays a crucial role in the feedback-based control of speech production.

Indexed as

Feedback, SensorySpeechAcoustic StimulationAdultAuditory CortexBrain MappingCerebellumElectroencephalographyEvoked PotentialsFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedSpinocerebellar AtaxiasTemporal Lobeauditory feedbackcerebellumevent-related potentialspeech motor controlspinocerebellar ataxia

Identifiers

PMID31365181
PMCPMC6865477
OpenAlexW2964906486

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.