Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31365116›Full record

Observational studyJapanese journal of clinical oncology2019

Interim results of a real-world observational study of eribulin in soft tissue sarcoma including rare subtypes.

Eisuke Kobayashi, Yoichi Naito, Naofumi Asano, Aiko Maejima, Makoto Endo, Shunji Takahashi, Yasunori Megumi, Akira Kawai

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Japanese journal of clinical oncology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03058406 (Special Use Investigation of HALAVEN), which is not on this map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03058406 completednot on this map

Special Use Investigation of HALAVEN (HAL03T) - Study on Safety and Efficacy in Patients With Soft Tissue Sarcomas

TypeobservationalSponsorEisai Co., Ltd.Ran2016 to 2018Enrolled256ConditionsSarcoma, Soft TissueArmsEribulin mesylate
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Aortic Intimal Sarcoma Diagnosed by Surgical Resection.Internal medicine (Tokyo, Japan) · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Observational
  11. Efficacy of Eribulin in Soft Tissue Sarcomas.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2022
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Eisuke KobayashiDepartment of Musculoskeletal Oncology and Rehabilitation, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Yoichi NaitoDepartment of Breast and Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Chiba, Japan.
Naofumi AsanoDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Keio University Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Aiko MaejimaRare Cancer Center, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Makoto EndoDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Kyushu University Hospital, Fukuoka, Japan.
Shunji TakahashiDepartment of Medical Oncology, The Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan.
Yasunori MegumiClinical Planning and Development Department, Medical Headquarters, Eisai Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan.
Akira KawaiDepartment of Musculoskeletal Oncology and Rehabilitation, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough eribulin is used to treat soft tissue sarcomas (STSs), treatment data for rare subtypes are limited. We conducted a post-marketing surveillance study to assess safety and efficacy of eribulin in STS patients stratified by subtype.

methodsJapanese patients (n = 256) with advanced or metastatic STS receiving eribulin treatment were monitored for treatment status, adverse events, diagnostic imaging, and clinical outcomes at 3 months and 1 year. Interim analysis was performed. Patients will be monitored up to 2 years.

resultsInterim analysis included 3-month (n = 255), imaging (n = 226), and 1-year (n = 105) data. STS subtype distribution was normal. Median number of eribulin cycles was 3.0 (range: 1-17 cycles). Among patients with imaging data, best overall tumor response (12 weeks) was partial response, 7.5% (n = 17); stable disease, 34.5% (n = 78); and stable disease ≥11 weeks, 10.2% (n = 23). Overall response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and clinical benefit rate (CBR) for all patients were 7.5%, 42.0% and 17.7%, respectively. ORR, DCR, and CBR were 10.3%, 32.0% and 16.5%, respectively, for patients with STS subtypes other than liposarcoma and leiomyosarcoma and included responses from patients with rare STS subtypes. Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) occurred in 211 (82.7%) patients (42 [16.5%] patients had serious ADRs), and none led to death. ADRs leading to drug withdrawal and dose reduction occurred in 27 (10.6%) and 55 (21.6%) patients, respectively.

conclusionEribulin was generally well tolerated and showed antitumor activity against STSs, including rare subtypes that currently have few treatment options. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: NCT03058406 (ClinicalTrials.gov).

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overDose-Response Relationship, DrugFemaleFuransHumansKetonesLeiomyosarcomaLiposarcomaMaleMiddle AgedPolyether PolyketidesSarcomaSoft Tissue NeoplasmseribulinFuransKetonesPolyether PolyketidesEribulinpost-marketing product surveillancesoft tissue sarcoma (STS)

Identifiers

PMID31365116
PMCPMC6886464

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.