Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31365111›Full record

SynthesisJAMA network open2019

Assessment of Therapeutic Interventions and Lung Protective Ventilation in Patients With Moderate to Severe Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis.

Hiroko Aoyama, Kanji Uchida, Kazuyoshi Aoyama, Petros Pechlivanoglou, Marina Englesakis, Yoshitsugu Yamada, Eddy Fan

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic ReviewNetwork Meta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in JAMA network open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers, 10 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed, 10 pooled it
8.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed, 10 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 104 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. [S3 guideline on sepsis-prevention, diagnosis, therapy, and follow-up care-update 2025].Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2025
    Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Prone position for acute respiratory failure in adults.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2015
    Pooled it
  11. Trial
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Translational medicine for acute lung injury.Journal of translational medicine · 2024
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Hiroko AoyamaDepartment of Anesthesiology, Graduate School of Medicine, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Kanji UchidaDepartment of Anesthesiology, Graduate School of Medicine, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Kazuyoshi AoyamaDepartment of Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Petros PechlivanoglouPeter Gilgan Centre for Research and Learning, The Hospital for Sick Children Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Marina EnglesakisLibrary and Information Services, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Yoshitsugu YamadaDepartment of Anesthesiology, Graduate School of Medicine, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Eddy FanInterdepartmental Division of Critical Care Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
The University of Tokyo · JPHospital for Sick Children · CASickKids Foundation · CAUniversity Health Network · CAUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

CIHR
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: A number of interventions are available to manage patients with moderate to severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). However, the associations of currently available ventilatory strategies and adjunctive therapies with mortality are uncertain. Objectives: To compare and rank different therapeutic strategies to identify the best intervention associated with a reduction in mortality in adult patients with moderate to severe ARDS. Data Sources: An electronic search of MEDLINE, MEDLINE In-Process/ePubs Ahead of Print, Embase, Cochrane Controlled Clinical Trial Register (Central), PubMed, and CINAHL was conducted, from database inception to May 29, 2019. Study Selection: Randomized clinical trials of interventions for adults with moderate to severe ARDS that used lung protective ventilation. No language restrictions were applied. Data Extraction and Synthesis: Data were independently extracted by 2 reviewers and synthesized with Bayesian random-effects network meta-analyses. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was 28-day mortality. Barotrauma was a secondary outcome. Results: Among 25 randomized clinical trials evaluating 9 interventions, 2686 of 7743 patients (34.6%) died within 28 days. Compared with lung protective ventilation alone, prone positioning and venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation were associated with significantly lower 28-day mortality (prone positioning: risk ratio, 0.69; 95% credible interval, 0.48-0.99; low quality of evidence; venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: risk ratio, 0.60; 95% credible interval, 0.38-0.93; moderate quality of evidence). These 2 interventions had the highest ranking probabilities, although they were not significantly different from each other. Among 18 trials reporting on barotrauma, 448 of 6258 patients (7.2%) experienced this secondary outcome. No intervention was superior to any other in reducing barotrauma, and each represented low to very low quality of evidence. Conclusions and Relevance: This network meta-analysis supports the use of prone positioning and venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in addition to lung protective ventilation in patients with ARDS. Moreover, venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation may be considered as an early strategy for adults with severe ARDS receiving lung protective ventilation.

Indexed as

AdultAgedBayes TheoremExtracorporeal Membrane OxygenationFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient PositioningRespiration, ArtificialRespiratory Distress Syndrome

Identifiers

PMID31365111
PMCPMC6669780
OpenAlexW2965320936

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.