Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31365108›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2019

National Trends in Colorectal Cancer Incidence Among Older and Younger Adults in Canada.

Darren R Brenner, Emily Heer, R Liam Sutherland, Yibing Ruan, Jill Tinmouth, Steven J Heitman, Robert J Hilsden

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 66 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
66citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
6.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

66 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 116 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

6 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Darren R BrennerDepartment of Oncology, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Emily HeerDepartment of Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention Research, CancerControl Alberta, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
R Liam SutherlandDepartment of Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention Research, CancerControl Alberta, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Yibing RuanDepartment of Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention Research, CancerControl Alberta, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Jill TinmouthInstitute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Steven J HeitmanDepartment of Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Robert J HilsdenDepartment of Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Alberta Health Services · CAUniversity of Calgary · CAHealth Sciences Centre · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Recent evidence has shown that although the incidence of colorectal cancer (CRC) is decreasing among older adults, rates have increased in adults younger than 50 years. Given that younger adults are typically classified as at low risk for the disease, this epidemiologic shift is cause for concern. Objective: To analyze Canadian national cancer incidence registries to determine incidence trends for CRC among older and younger adults, updated to 2015. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study determined the incidence of CRC using data from the National Cancer Incidence Reporting System (1969-1992) and the Canadian Cancer Registry (1992-2015). All Canadians diagnosed with CRC from January 1, 1969, through December 31, 2015, were included in this study. Trends among men and women were examined separately and by age category (>50 vs <50 years). Birth cohort models were fit using 5-year groups starting in 1886, with 1936 as the reference cohort. Data were analyzed from May 13, 2018 to May 16, 2018. Main Outcomes and Measures: Annualized percentage changes and incidence rate ratios of CRC. Results: From 1971 to 2015, 688 515 incident cases (52.9% women) of CRC were identified. Although the incidence of CRC has decreased in older men and women, rates among younger men and women have increased since 2006 and 2010, respectively. For women younger than 50 years, incidence has increased with a mean annual percentage change of 4.45% since 2010; for men younger than 50 years, a mean annual percentage change of 3.47% from 2006 through 2015. There was an association between CRC incidence and birth cohort, with more recent cohorts being at greater risk than those born earlier. For men, the risk of colorectal cancer in the youngest cohort is more than double that of the reference (incidence rate ratio, 2.57; 95% CI, 1.32-5.02). Incidence rate ratios were not significant for women (IRR, 2.12; 95% CI, 0.95-4.70) but increased in successively younger cohorts. Conclusions and Relevance: This study found increasing incidence of colorectal cancer diagnoses among Canadian men and women younger than 50 years of age. This increase in incidence among a low-risk population calls for additional research on possible risk factors that may be affecting these younger cohorts. It appears that primary prevention should be the highest priority to reduce the number of younger adults developing CRC in the future.

Indexed as

Age FactorsAdultAgedCanadaColorectal NeoplasmsFemaleHumansIncidenceMaleMiddle AgedRegistriesRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID31365108
PMCPMC6669779
OpenAlexW2965845318

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.