Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31364724›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular medicine2019

miRNA profile obtained by next‑generation sequencing in metastatic breast cancer patients is able to predict the response to systemic treatments.

Antonio Daniel Martinez-Gutierrez, Oliver Millan Catalan, Rafael Vázquez-Romo, Fany Iris Porras Reyes, Alberto Alvarado-Miranda, Fernando Lara Medina, Juan E Bargallo-Rocha, Luz Tonatzin Orozco Moreno, David Cantú De León, Luis Alonso Herrera and 3 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. microRNAs as Biomarkers of Breast Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. miRNA in Molecular Diagnostics.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. MicroRNA signatures associated with lymph node metastasis in intramucosal gastric cancer.Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc · 2021
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Role and mechanism of miR-187 in human cancer.American journal of translational research · 2020
    Review
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Antonio Daniel Martinez-GutierrezLaboratorio de Genómica, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología (INCan), UNAM, Mexico City 14080, Mexico.
Oliver Millan CatalanLaboratorio de Genómica, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología (INCan), UNAM, Mexico City 14080, Mexico.
Rafael Vázquez-RomoDepartamento de Cirugía de Tumores Mamarios, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología (INCan), UNAM, Mexico City 14080, Mexico.
Fany Iris Porras ReyesServicio de Anatomía Patológica, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología (INCan), UNAM, Mexico City 14080, Mexico.
Alberto Alvarado-MirandaUnidad de Cáncer de Mama, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología (INCan), UNAM, Mexico City 14080, Mexico.
Fernando Lara MedinaUnidad de Cáncer de Mama, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología (INCan), UNAM, Mexico City 14080, Mexico.
Juan E Bargallo-RochaUnidad de Cáncer de Mama, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología (INCan), UNAM, Mexico City 14080, Mexico.
Luz Tonatzin Orozco MorenoLaboratorio de Genómica, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología (INCan), UNAM, Mexico City 14080, Mexico.
David Cantú De LeónUnidad de Investigación Biomédica en Cáncer, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología (INCan)‑Instituto de Investigaciones Biomédicas, UNAM, Mexico City 14080, Mexico.
Luis Alonso HerreraUnidad de Investigación Biomédica en Cáncer, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología (INCan)‑Instituto de Investigaciones Biomédicas, UNAM, Mexico City 14080, Mexico.
César López-CamarilloPosgrado en Ciencias Genómicas, Universidad Autónoma de la Ciudad de México, CDMX, Mexico City 03100, Mexico.
Carlos Pérez-PlasenciaLaboratorio de Genómica, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología (INCan), UNAM, Mexico City 14080, Mexico.
Alma D Campos-ParraLaboratorio de Genómica, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología (INCan), UNAM, Mexico City 14080, Mexico.
Instituto Nacional de Cancerología · MXUniversidad Autónoma de la Ciudad de México · MX

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Metastatic breast cancer (MBC) is a challenge for oncologists, and public efforts should focus on identifying additional molecular markers and therapeutic management to improve clinical outcomes. Among all diagnosed cases of breast cancer (BC; approximately 10%) involve metastatic disease; notably, approximately 40% of patients with early‑stage BC develop metastasis within 5 years. The management of MBC consists of systemic therapy. Despite different treatment options, the 5‑year survival rate is <20%, which may be due to a lack of response with de novo or acquired resistance. MicroRNAs (miRNAs or miRs) are promising biomarkers as they are readily detectable and have a broad spectrum and potential clinical applications. The aim of this study was to identify a miRNA profile for distinguishing patients with MBC who respond to systemic treatment. Patients with MBC were treated according to the National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines. We performed miRNA‑Seq on 9 primary tumors using the Thermo Fisher Scientific Ion S5 system. To obtain global miRNA profiles, we carried out differentially expressed gene elimination strategy (DEGES) analysis between the responsive and non‑responsive patients. The results identified a profile of 12 miRNAs associated with the response to systemic treatment. The data were validated in an independent cohort (TCGA database). Based on the results, the upregulation of miR‑342‑3p and miR‑187‑3p was associated with the response to systemic treatment, and with an increased progression‑free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS); by contrast, the downregulation of miR‑301a‑3p was associated with a higher PFS and OS. On the whole, the findings of this study indicate that these miRNAs may serve as biomarkers for the response to systemic treatment or the prognosis of patients with MBC. However, these data should be validated experimentally in other robust cohorts and using different specimens before implementing these miRNAs as biomarkers in clinical practice to benefit this group of patients.

Indexed as

TranscriptomeAdultAgedBiomarkers, TumorBreast NeoplasmsCombined Modality TherapyFemaleGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansMicroRNAsMiddle AgedNeoplasm MetastasisNeoplasm StagingPrognosisReproducibility of ResultsBiomarkers, TumorMicroRNAs

Identifiers

PMID31364724
PMCPMC6713405
OpenAlexW2965778184

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.