Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31364647›Full record

ArticleNatural product reports2020

Imaging mass spectrometry for natural products discovery: a review of ionization methods.

Joseph E Spraker, Gordon T Luu, Laura M Sanchez

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Natural product reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. MALDI-TIMS-MSAnalytical chemistry · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Evaluation ofToxicon: X · 2025
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Toward an Efficient Differentiation of TwoCurrent issues in molecular biology · 2025
    Article
  10. Mass Spectrometry Imaging for Spatial Toxicology Research.Journal of mass spectrometry : JMS · 2024
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. ReducingAnalytical chemistry · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Joseph E SprakerHexagon Bio, 1505 Adams Drive, Suite A, Menlo Park, CA 94025, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5429-0328
Gordon T LuuDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Illinois at Chicago, 833 S Wood St, Chicago, IL 60612, USA, sanchelm@uic.edu.
Laura M SanchezDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Illinois at Chicago, 833 S Wood St, Chicago, IL 60612, USA, sanchelm@uic.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-9223-7977

Funding

MALDI-TOF MS/IDBac to discover antibiotics from the Great Lakes sponge microbiomeR01GM125943 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO · PI MURPHY, BRIAN THACHER, SANCHEZ, LAURA MARGARET · 2018 to 2021
$2.1M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM125943
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Covering: 2009-2019 Over the last decade, methods in imaging mass spectrometry (IMS) have progressively improved and diversified toward a variety of applications in natural products research. Because IMS allows for the spatial mapping of the production and distribution of biologically active molecules in situ, it facilitates phenotype and organelle driven discovery efforts. As practitioners of IMS for natural products discovery, we find one of the most important aspects of these experiments is the sample preparation and compatibility with different ionization sources that are available to a given researcher. As such, we have focused this mini review to cover types of ionization sources that have been used in natural products discovery applications and provided concrete examples of use for natural products discovery while discussing the advantages and limitations of each method. We aim for this article to serve as a resource to guide the broader natural product community interested in IMS toward the application/method that would best serve their natural product discovery needs given the sample and analyte(s) of interest. This mini review has been limited to applications using natural products and thus is not exhaustive of all possible ionization methods which have only been applied to image other types of samples such as mammalian tissues. Additionally, we briefly review how IMS has been coupled with other imaging platforms, such as microscopy, to enhance information outputs as well as offer our future perspectives on the incorporation of IMS in natural products discovery.

Indexed as

Biological ProductsLaser TherapyMass SpectrometryMicroscopy, Atomic ForceMicroscopy, FluorescenceMultimodal ImagingSpectrometry, Mass, Electrospray IonizationSpectrometry, Mass, Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption-IonizationSpectrometry, Mass, Secondary IonWorkflowBiological Products

Identifiers

PMID31364647
PMCPMC6992513

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.