Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31364563›Full record

ArticleEpidemiology and infection2019

Global and regional source attribution of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli infections using analysis of outbreak surveillance data.

Sara M Pires, Shannon Majowicz, Alexander Gill, Brecht Devleesschauwer

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Epidemiology and infection, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
7.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 73 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Reasons for difficulties in isolating the causative organism during food-borne outbreak investigations using STEC as a model pathogen: a systematic review, 2000 to 2019.Euro surveillance : bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin · 2024
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Shiga Toxin-ProducingMicroorganisms · 2025
    Review
  9. Cross-sectoral genomic surveillance reveals a lack of insight in sources of human infections with Shiga toxin-producingEuro surveillance : bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Shiga-Toxin-Producing Strains ofMicroorganisms · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Shiga toxin-producingAccess microbiology · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Sara M PiresNational Food Institute,Technical University of Denmark,Lyngby,Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-7751-1509
Shannon MajowiczUniversity of Waterloo,Waterloo,Ontario,Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-0006-8369
Alexander GillBureau of Microbial Hazards, Health Canada,Ottawa,Ontario,Canada.
Brecht DevleesschauwerDepartment of Epidemiology and Public Health,Sciensano,Brussels,Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-2867-6892
Ghent University · BEHealth Canada · CATechnical University of Denmark · DKUniversity of Waterloo · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC) infections pose a substantial health and economic burden worldwide. To target interventions to prevent foodborne infections, it is important to determine the types of foods leading to illness. Our objective was to determine the food sources of STEC globally and for the six World Health Organization regions. We used data from STEC outbreaks that have occurred globally to estimate source attribution fractions. We categorised foods according to their ingredients and applied a probabilistic model that used information on implicated foods for source attribution. Data were received from 27 countries covering the period between 1998 and 2017 and three regions: the Americas (AMR), Europe (EUR) and Western-Pacific (WPR). Results showed that the top foods varied across regions. The most important sources in AMR were beef (40%; 95% Uncertainty Interval 39-41%) and produce (35%; 95% UI 34-36%). In EUR, the ranking was similar though with less marked differences between sources (beef 31%; 95% UI 28-34% and produce 30%; 95% UI 27-33%). In contrast, the most common source of STEC in WPR was produce (43%; 95% UI 36-46%), followed by dairy (27%; 95% UI 27-27%). Possible explanations for regional variability include differences in food consumption and preparation, frequency of STEC contamination, the potential of regionally predominant STEC strains to cause severe illness and differences in outbreak investigation and reporting. Despite data gaps, these results provide important information to inform the development of strategies for lowering the global burden of STEC infections.

Indexed as

AnimalsCattleDisease OutbreaksEscherichia coli InfectionsFoodborne DiseasesGlobal HealthHumansIncidencePopulation SurveillanceRisk AssessmentShiga-Toxigenic Escherichia coliShiga ToxinWorld Health OrganizationShiga ToxinFood safetyoutbreaksShiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC)source attribution

Identifiers

PMID31364563
PMCPMC6625198
OpenAlexW2959545842

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.