Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31364540›Full record

ArticleEpidemiology and infection2019

Test characteristics of the tuberculin skin test and post-mortem examination for bovine tuberculosis diagnosis in cattle in Northern Ireland estimated by Bayesian latent class analysis with adjustments for covariates.

M J H O'Hagan, H Ni, F D Menzies, A V Pascual-Linaza, A Georgaki, J A Stegeman

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Epidemiology and infection, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

M J H O'HaganVeterinary Epidemiology Unit, Department of Agriculture,Environment and Rural Affairs,Upper Newtownards Road, Belfast, Northern Ireland,UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6156-6540
H NiDepartment of Methodology and Statistics, Faculty of Social and Behavioural Sciences,Utrecht University,Padualaan, Utrecht,The Netherlands.
F D MenziesVeterinary Epidemiology Unit, Department of Agriculture,Environment and Rural Affairs,Upper Newtownards Road, Belfast, Northern Ireland,UK.
A V Pascual-LinazaSurveillance and Antimicrobial Resistance Branch, Department of Agriculture,Environment and Rural Affairs,Upper Newtownards Road, Belfast, Northern Ireland,UK.
A GeorgakiVeterinary Epidemiology Unit, Department of Agriculture,Environment and Rural Affairs,Upper Newtownards Road, Belfast, Northern Ireland,UK.
J A StegemanDepartment of Farm Animal Health, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine,Utrecht University,Yalelaan, Utrecht,The Netherlands.
Department of Agriculture and Rural Development · GBUtrecht University · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The single intradermal comparative cervical tuberculin (SICCT) test and post-mortem examination are the main diagnostic tools for bovine tuberculosis (bTB) in cattle in the British Isles. Latent class modelling is often used to estimate the bTB test characteristics due to the absence of a gold standard. However, the reported sensitivity of especially the SICCT test has shown a lot of variation. We applied both the Hui-Walter latent class model under the Bayesian framework and the Bayesian model specified at the animal level, including various risk factors as predictors, to estimate the SICCT test and post-mortem test characteristics. Data were collected from all cattle slaughtered in abattoirs in Northern Ireland in 2015. Both models showed comparable posterior median estimation for the sensitivity of the SICCT test (88.61% and 90.56%, respectively) using standard interpretation and for post-mortem examination (53.65% and 53.79%, respectively). Both models showed almost identical posterior median estimates for the specificity (99.99% vs. 99.80% for SICCT test at standard interpretation and 99.66% vs. 99.86% for post-mortem examination). The animal-level model showed slightly narrower posterior 95% credible intervals. Notably, this study was carried out in slaughtered cattle which may not be representative for the general cattle population.

Indexed as

AutopsyAnimalsBayes TheoremCattleDiagnostic Tests, RoutineLatent Class AnalysisNorthern IrelandSensitivity and SpecificityTuberculin TestTuberculosis, BovineBayesian analysiscattlelatent class modelMycobacterium bovispost-mortem examinationskin testtest characteristics

Identifiers

PMID31364540
PMCPMC6624860
OpenAlexW2946854336

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.