Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31364520›Full record

ArticleEpidemiology and infection2019

Evaluating sub-typing methods for pathogenic Yersinia enterocolitica to support outbreak investigations in New Zealand.

H Strydom, J Wang, S Paine, K Dyet, K Cullen, J Wright

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Epidemiology and infection, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Virulence Determinants and Genetic Diversity ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  9. Yersiniosis in New Zealand.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

H StrydomInstitute of Environmental Science & Research (ESR),Porirua,New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0003-3886-9599
J WangInstitute of Environmental Science & Research (ESR),Porirua,New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0002-7002-2374
S PaineInstitute of Environmental Science & Research (ESR),Porirua,New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0002-0961-0281
K DyetInstitute of Environmental Science & Research (ESR),Porirua,New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0003-2508-6843
K CullenInstitute of Environmental Science & Research (ESR),Porirua,New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0002-9039-2778
J WrightInstitute of Environmental Science & Research (ESR),Porirua,New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0001-6462-4769

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Incidence of human yersiniosis in New Zealand has increased between 2013 and 2017. For surveillance and outbreak investigations it is essential that an appropriate level of discrimination between pathogenic Yersinia enterocolitica isolates is provided, in order to support epidemiological linking of connected cases. Subtyping of 227 Y. enterocolitica isolates was performed using a range of different typing methods, including biotyping, serotyping and seven loci multiple-locus variable-number tandem-repeat analysis (MLVA). In addition, core genome single-nucleotide polymorphism (core SNP) analysis and multi-locus sequence typing were performed on a subset of 69 isolates. Sixty-seven different MLVA types were identified. One MLVA profile was associated with an outbreak in the Bay of Plenty region, supported by epidemiological data. Core SNP analysis showed that all the outbreak-related isolates clustered together. The subtyping and epidemiological evidence suggests that the outbreak of yersiniosis in the Bay of Plenty region between October and December 2016 could be attributed to a point source. However, subtyping results further suggest that the same clone was isolated from several regions between August 2016 and March 2017. Core SNP analysis and MLVA typing failed to differentiate between Y. enterocolitica biotype 2 and biotype 3. For this reason, we propose that these biotypes should be reported as a single type namely: Y. enterocolitica biotype 2/3 and that the serotype should be prioritised as an indicator of prevalence.

Indexed as

Disease OutbreaksBacterial Typing TechniquesNew ZealandYersinia enterocoliticaYersinia InfectionsOutbreakssurveillanceYersinia enterocolitica

Identifiers

PMID31364520
PMCPMC6518587

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.