Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31364321›Full record

ArticleJournal of veterinary science2019

Anatomical variations of the equine popliteal tendon.

Gabriel Cuevas-Ramos, Melanie Cova, David Arguelles, Marta Prades

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of veterinary science, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Gabriel Cuevas-RamosUniversité de Toulouse, Equine Surgery Department, École Nationale Vétérinaire de Toulouse, Toulouse 31076, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8851-8389
Melanie CovaUniversité de Toulouse, Equine Surgery Department, École Nationale Vétérinaire de Toulouse, Toulouse 31076, France.
David ArguellesUniversitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Equine Clinic, Cerdanyola del Vallès, Barcelona 08193, Spain.
Marta PradesUniversitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Equine Clinic, Cerdanyola del Vallès, Barcelona 08193, Spain.
Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona · ESÉcole Nationale Vétérinaire de Toulouse · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The function of the popliteal muscle and tendon in horses remains undescribed. In humans, it is considered a stabilizer of the posterior-lateral region of the knee; its function is closely related to that of the lateral collateral ligament (LCL) and meniscus. The popliteal tendon (PopT) constitutes the main proximal attachment of the popliteus muscle to the femur, and in humans, insertional variations have been described. Knowledge of anatomical variations is needed for the correct interpretation of diagnostic images and arthroscopic findings. To elucidate further the anatomy of the equine PopT, both hind limbs of 30 horses were dissected. Similar to humans, the equine PopT has 3 variants (types I, II, and III) depending on the number of components forming the tendon. Additionally, the area of insertion varies; the location can be either cranial, underneath, or caudal to the proximal insertion of the LCL. Furthermore, the PopT has a constant attachment to the lateral meniscus. The results of the present study are useful for clinicians working with equine orthopedics, as the tendon and insertional variants could affect the interpretation of diagnostic images and arthroscopic examinations.

Indexed as

AnimalsFemaleHindlimbHorsesMaleTendonsanatomic variationhorsesPopliteal tendonstifle

Identifiers

PMID31364321
PMCPMC6669204
OpenAlexW2956319901

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.